—–BEGIN PRIVACY-ENHANCED MESSAGE—–
Proc-Type: 2001,MIC-CLEAR
Originator-Name: webmaster@www.sec.gov
Originator-Key-Asymmetric:
MFgwCgYEVQgBAQICAf8DSgAwRwJAW2sNKK9AVtBzYZmr6aGjlWyK3XmZv3dTINen
TWSM7vrzLADbmYQaionwg5sDW3P6oaM5D3tdezXMm7z1T+B+twIDAQAB
MIC-Info: RSA-MD5,RSA,
NEvHK8ID97cYwjYPAgrWGeTrAMR33jFXFvjmINMJ1d5sXda05uZ5nNUPNPVpsOLg
9GYdtV/9OQ7o/zg22eZqtw==

0000950133-97-001298.txt : 19970411
0000950133-97-001298.hdr.sgml : 19970411
ACCESSION NUMBER: 0000950133-97-001298
CONFORMED SUBMISSION TYPE: DEF 14A
PUBLIC DOCUMENT COUNT: 1
CONFORMED PERIOD OF REPORT: 19970509
FILED AS OF DATE: 19970410
SROS: NONE

FILER:

COMPANY DATA:
COMPANY CONFORMED NAME: AMERICAN MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS INC
CENTRAL INDEX KEY: 0000310624
STANDARD INDUSTRIAL CLASSIFICATION: SERVICES-COMPUTER PROGRAMMING, DATA PROCESSING, ETC. [7370]
IRS NUMBER: 540856778
STATE OF INCORPORATION: DE
FISCAL YEAR END: 1231

FILING VALUES:
FORM TYPE: DEF 14A
SEC ACT: 1934 Act
SEC FILE NUMBER: 000-09233
FILM NUMBER: 97577977

BUSINESS ADDRESS:
STREET 1: 4050 LEGATO RD
CITY: FAIRFAX
STATE: VA
ZIP: 22033
BUSINESS PHONE: 7032678000


DEF 14A
1
AMERICAN MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS PROXY STATEMENT.

1
SCHEDULE 14A
(RULE 14a-101)

INFORMATION REQUIRED IN PROXY STATEMENT

SCHEDULE 14A INFORMATION

PROXY STATEMENT PURSUANT TO SECTION 14(a)
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

Filed by the Registrant [x]

Filed by a Party other than the Registrant [ ]

Check the appropriate box:

[ ] Preliminary Proxy Statement
[ ] Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule
14a-6(e)(2))
[x] Definitive Proxy Statement
[ ] Definitive Additional Materials
[ ] Soliciting Material Pursuant to Rule 14a-11(c) or Rule 14a-12

AMERICAN MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS, INCORPORATED
– ——————————————————————————–
(Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)

N/A
– ——————————————————————————–
(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the Registrant)

Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):

[x] No fee required

[ ] Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(4) and
0-11.

(1) Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies:
(2) Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies:
(3) Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed
pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (set forth the amount on which
the filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined):
(4) Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction:
(5) Total fee paid:

[ ] Fee paid previously with preliminary materials.

[ ] Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act
Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee
was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration
statement number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing.

(1) Amount Previously Paid: (3) Filing Party:
(2) Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.: (4) Date Filed:
2
AMERICAN MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS, INCORPORATED
4050 LEGATO ROAD
FAIRFAX, VIRGINIA 22033

NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS

NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Annual Meeting of Shareholders of
AMERICAN MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS, INCORPORATED will be held at 4050 Legato Road,
Fairfax, Virginia 22033 on Friday, May 9, 1997, at 10:00 a.m. local time, for
the following purposes:

To elect eleven (11) directors to hold office until the next Annual
Meeting of Shareholders of American Management Systems, Incorporated and until
their successors are elected and qualified;

To approve 1996 Amended Stock Option Plan F; and

To transact such other business as may properly come before the meeting
or any adjournment or adjournments thereof.

Only shareholders of record at the close of business on March 21, 1997,
will be entitled to notice of, and to vote at, the meeting or any adjournment
thereof.

Shareholders are cordially invited to attend the meeting in person. IF
YOU WILL NOT BE ABLE TO ATTEND THE MEETING IN PERSON, PLEASE INDICATE YOUR
CHOICE ON THE MATTERS TO BE VOTED UPON, DATE AND SIGN THE ENCLOSED PROXY, AND
RETURN IT PROMPTLY IN THE ENCLOSED ENVELOPE.

BY ORDER OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS,

Frank A. Nicolai
Secretary

April 11, 1997
3
AMERICAN MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS, INCORPORATED
4050 LEGATO ROAD
FAIRFAX, VIRGINIA 22033

PROXY STATEMENT

ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS
MAY 9, 1997

TABLE OF CONTENTS



PAGE
—-

General . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1
Voting Procedure . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1
Election of Directors . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2
Information Concerning Nominees FOR Director . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2
Information Concerning Executive Officers . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
Principal Stockholders . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9
Executive Compensation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10
Compensation Committee Report OF Executive Compensation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13
Shareholder Return Performance Graph . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16
Committees OF THE Board OF Directors . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17
Compensation Committee Interlocks AND Insider Participation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18
Certain Transactions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18
Proposal TO Approve 1996 Amended Stock Option Plan F . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18
Other Matters . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24
Annual Report . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24
American Management Systems, Incorporated 1996 Amended Stock Option Plan F . . . . . . . . . . . Exhibit A
American Management Systems, Incorporated 1996 Financial Report . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Appendix 1

4
GENERAL

The enclosed Proxy is being solicited by the Board of Directors of
AMERICAN MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS, INCORPORATED (the “Company” or “AMS”) in
connection with the annual meeting of shareholders of the Company to be held
May 9, 1997 (the “Annual Meeting”), or any adjournment or adjournments thereof.
The entire expense of solicitation of proxies will be borne by the Company.
Solicitation will be primarily by mail. However, directors, executive officers,
and employees of the Company may also solicit by telephone or personal contact.
The Company will reimburse brokers and other persons holding shares in their
names, or in the names of nominees, for their expenses of sending proxy
materials to beneficial owners and obtaining their proxies. It is anticipated
that the Proxy Statement and Proxy first will be mailed to shareholders on or
about April 11, 1997.

Any shareholder giving a Proxy has the power to revoke it at any time
before it is voted by giving notice of revocation to the Secretary of the
Company. If you attend the Annual Meeting, you may, if you wish, revoke your
Proxy by voting in person. Proxies solicited herein will be voted, and if the
person solicited specifies in the Proxy a choice with respect to matters to be
acted upon, the shares will be voted in accordance with such specification. If
no choice is indicated, the Proxy will be voted for the election of the
nominees listed on pages 2 to 6 under the caption “Information Concerning
Nominees for Director” and for the approval of the AMS 1996 Amended Stock
Option Plan F (“Stock Option Plan F” or “Plan F”).

VOTING PROCEDURE

As of March 21, 1997, there were outstanding 41,240,731 shares of the
Company’s Common Stock, $0.01 par value per share (the “Common Stock”). Each
share of Common Stock is entitled to one vote at the Annual Meeting. Only
shareholders of record at the close of business on March 21, 1997 will be
entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting.

Votes cast in person or by Proxy at the Annual Meeting, abstentions and
Broker Non-votes (as defined below) will be tabulated by the election
inspectors appointed for such Meeting and will be counted for purposes of
determining whether a quorum is present. Each matter submitted to a vote at
the Annual Meeting will be approved by the affirmative vote of the holders of a
majority of the shares present (in person or represented by Proxy) and entitled
to vote on such matter. The election inspectors will treat abstentions on a
particular matter as shares that are present and entitled to vote for purposes
of determining the approval of such matter. Abstentions, therefore, will have
the same effect as a vote against a particular matter. If a broker submits a
Proxy indicating that it does not have discretionary authority as to certain
shares to vote on a particular matter (a “Broker Non-vote”), those shares will
not be treated as present and entitled to vote for purposes of determining the
approval of such matter.

1
5
ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

Eleven directors are to be elected at the Annual Meeting, each to hold
office until the next annual meeting of shareholders of the Company and until
his or her successor is elected and qualified. The directors will be elected
by the affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the shares present in
person or represented by Proxy and entitled to vote on the election of
directors. Unless otherwise directed, it is the intention of the persons named
in the Proxy to vote such Proxy for the election of the nominees listed on
pages 2 to 6. All of the nominees are now directors of the Company. In the
event that any nominee should be unable to accept the office of director, which
is not anticipated, it is intended that the persons named in the Proxy will
vote for the election of such other person in the place of such nominee for the
office of director as the Board of Directors may recommend. Descriptive
information as to each nominee is set forth below under the caption
“Information Concerning Nominees for Director.”

INFORMATION CONCERNING NOMINEES FOR DIRECTOR



YEAR
FIRST
ELECTED
NAME AGE POSITION DIRECTOR BACKGROUND
—- — ——– ——– ———-

Charles O. Rossotti………… 56 Chairman of the Board 1970 Mr. Rossotti is one of the founders of the
of Directors and Company and was elected Chairman of the Board of
Director Directors in February 1989. He has served as a
member of the Board of Directors since 1970, and
as Chief Executive Officer from 1982 to
September 1993. He served as President from
1970 to October 1992. He is also a director of
Intersolv, Inc., a publicly held corporation.

Patrick W. Gross…………… 52 Vice Chairman of the 1974 Mr. Gross is one of the Company’s founders and
Board of Directors and has served AMS continuously as an executive
Director officer since 1970. He was elected Vice
Chairman of the Board of Directors in February
1989 and was Chairman of the Executive Committee
from 1983 until 1989. He is a director of
Capital One Financial Corporation, which is a
publicly held entity. He is also Chairman of
the Board of Directors of Baker & Taylor
Holdings, Inc. and a director of Landmark
Systems Corporation and Powersim Corporation,
all of which are non-publicly held entities.

2
6



YEAR
FIRST
ELECTED
NAME AGE POSITION DIRECTOR BACKGROUND
—- — ——– ——– ———-

Paul A. Brands……………… 55 Vice Chairman of the 1992 Mr. Brands has served as Vice Chairman of the
Board of Directors, Board of Directors and a member of the Board of
Chief Executive Directors since October 1992. He was
Officer, and Director designated Chief Executive Officer in September
1993. He supervised the Federal Consulting and
Systems Group from 1977 to 1992; Data Base
Management, Inc. from 1990 to 1992; and the
Company’s interest in Bell Atlantic Systems
Integration Corporation from 1989 to 1992. Mr.
Brands joined the Company in 1977.

Philip M. Giuntini………….. 50 President and Director 1992 Mr. Giuntini has served as President and a
member of the Board of Directors since October
1992. He supervised the business units
responsible for the energy market from 1989 to
1992, the business units responsible for the
telecommunications market from 1985 to 1992,
and the business units responsible for other
systems integration and services markets from
1982 to 1992. Mr. Giuntini joined the Company
in 1970.

Frank A. Nicolai……………. 55 Executive Vice 1974 Mr. Nicolai is one of the Company’s founders and
President, Secretary, has served continuously as an executive officer
Treasurer, and since 1970. He was elected Treasurer in 1980
Director and Secretary in 1987.

3
7



YEAR
FIRST
ELECTED
NAME AGE POSITION DIRECTOR BACKGROUND
—- — ——– ——– ———-

Daniel J. Altobello………… 56 Director 1993 Mr. Altobello has been Chairman and Director of
ONEX Food Services, Inc. since September 1995
and President of Caterair International
Corporation since December 1989. He served as
Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive
Officer of Caterair International Corporation
from December 1989 through September 1995. From
April 1988 through December 1989, Mr. Altobello
was Executive Vice President of Marriott
Corporation and President of Marriott Airport
Operations. He currently serves as a director
of Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Maryland, Inc.
and a member of the Advisory Board of Thayer
Capital Partners, a merchant bank. Neither of
these entities is publicly held.

James J. Forese…………….. 61 Director 1989 Mr. Forese is currently Executive Vice President
and President, International Operations of IKON
Office Solutions. From 1995 to 1996 he served
as Executive Vice President, Chief Operating
Officer, and Director of ALCO Standard
Corporation. From 1993 to 1995 he served as
General Manager of IBM Customer Financing and
Chairman of IBM Credit Corporation. He served
as IBM Vice President, Finance from 1990 to 1993
and IBM Vice President and Group Executive, IBM
World Americas Group from 1988 to 1990. He
currently serves as a director of NUI
Corporation and Unisource Worldwide, both of
which are publicly-held corporations. He joined
ALCO/IKON in 1996.

4
8



YEAR
FIRST
ELECTED
NAME AGE POSITION DIRECTOR BACKGROUND
– —- — ——– ——– ———-

Dorothy Leonard……………. 55 Director 1991 Dr. Leonard has been a Professor at the Harvard
University Graduate School of Business
Administration since 1993. Prior to this, she
served as an Associate Professor from 1989 to
1993, and an Assistant Professor from 1983 to
1989, at the Harvard University Graduate School
of Business Administration. Dr. Leonard also
serves as an independent industrial consultant
to various companies including, among others,
AT&T Bell Laboratories, Digital Equipment
Corporation, and IBM Corporation.

W. Walker Lewis……………. 52 Director 1995 Mr. Lewis has been a Senior Advisor with Dillon,
Read & Co., Inc. since January 1995. He was
Managing Director, Strategic Services, and a
member of the Management Committee of Kidder,
Peabody & Co., Inc. from April 1994 to December
1994. From April 1992 through December 1993 he
served as President of Avon North America, and
from March 1992 to December 1992 he served as
Executive Vice President of Avon Corporate. He
currently serves as a director of Owens Corning
Fiberglass, Unilab Corporation, and Mrs. Fields
Original Cookies, which are publicly-held
corporations, and Marakon Associates, which is a
non-publicly held entity. Mr. Lewis previously
served as a director of AMS from February 1981
through May 1992.

5
9



YEAR
FIRST
ELECTED
NAME AGE POSITION DIRECTOR BACKGROUND
– —- — ——– ——– ———-

Frederic V. Malek………….. 60 Director 1985 Mr. Malek has been Chairman of Thayer Capital
Partners, a merchant bank, since March 1993. He
was Co-Chairman, CB Commercial Real Estate Group
(a real estate brokerage and management firm)
from April 1989 to October 1996. He was
Campaign Manager for the re-election campaign of
President Bush and Vice President Quayle from
December 1991 to November 1992. He was Vice
Chairman of Northwest Airlines from 1990 until
December 1991, and was President of Northwest
Airlines from 1989 to 1990. From 1988 to 1989
he was Senior Advisor to The Carlyle Group
(investment bank), and from 1981 to 1988 he was
President of Marriott Hotels and Resorts. Mr.
Malek also serves as a director of Automatic
Data Processing, Inc.; National Education
Corporation; various Paine-Webber mutual funds;
CB Commercial Real Estate Group; FPL Group;
Northwest Airlines; Choice Hotels, Inc.; and
Manor Care, Inc., all of which are publicly-held
entities.

Alan G. Spoon………………. 45 Director 1996 (1) Mr. Spoon has been Chief Operating Officer and
Director of The Washington Post Company since
1991, and has also served as President since
1993. Mr. Spoon joined The Washington Post
Company in 1982. From 1989 to 1991, he was
President of Newsweek, Inc. During that time he
also was responsible for Post-Newsweek
television stations. From 1987 to 1989, he was
The Washington Post Company’s Chief Financial
Officer. He currently serves as a director of
The International Herald Tribune and Consumer’s
Edge, and is a member of The Advisory Board of
Polaris Ventures, L.P., a venture capital fund,
all of which are non-publicly held entities.

(1) Mr. Spoon was elected to the Board of Directors in September 1996 after
the Board voted to increase the number of directors constituting the
Board from ten members to eleven members.

6
10
INFORMATION CONCERNING EXECUTIVE OFFICERS

Information concerning Charles O. Rossotti, Chairman; Patrick W. Gross,
Vice Chairman; Paul A. Brands, Vice Chairman and Chief Executive Officer;
Philip M. Giuntini, President; and Frank A. Nicolai, Executive Vice President,
Secretary, and Treasurer, is set forth above under the caption “Information
Concerning Nominees for Director.”



NAME AGE POSITION BACKGROUND
—- — ——– ———-

Executive
Fred L. Forman. . . . . . . . . . . . . 53 Vice President Dr. Forman is a key participant in overall
corporate management and currently heads the
Company’s Achieving Breakthrough Performance
business reengineering initiative. He was in
charge of the Corporate Technology Group from
1986 until 1994. He joined the Company in 1971.

PRINCIPAL STOCKHOLDERS

The following table sets forth, as of March 21, 1997, the number and
percentage of outstanding shares of Common Stock beneficially owned by (i) all
persons known by the Company to own 5% or more of such shares, (ii) each
director, (iii) each executive officer, and (iv) all executive officers and
directors as a group. Unless otherwise noted below, each person or entity named
in the table has sole voting and sole investment power with respect to each of
the shares beneficially owned by such person or entity.



AMOUNT OF PERCENT OF
BENEFICIAL CLASS OF
NAME AND ADDRESS OF BENEFICIAL OWNER OWNERSHIP(1) OUTSTANDING SHARES(2)
– ———————————— ——— ——————

Daniel J. Altobello (3)(5) . . . . . . . . . . 15,468 Common-0.0%
6550 Rock Spring Drive
Bethesda, MD 20817

Paul A. Brands(3)(4) . . . . . . . . . . . . . 513,907 Common-1.2%
4050 Legato Road
Fairfax, VA 22033

James J. Forese(3) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 82,874 Common-0.2%
825 Duportail Road
Wayne, PA 19087

Fred L. Forman(4) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 270,546 Common-0.7%
4050 Legato Road
Fairfax, VA 22033

Philip M. Giuntini(3)(4)(6) . . . . . . . . . . 487,247 Common-1.2%
4050 Legato Road
Fairfax, VA 22033

Patrick W. Gross (3)(4)(7) . . . . . . . . . . 689,111 Common-1.7%
4050 Legato Road
Fairfax, VA 22033

7
11



AMOUNT OF PERCENT OF
BENEFICIAL CLASS OF
NAME AND ADDRESS OF BENEFICIAL OWNER OWNERSHIP(1) OUTSTANDING SHARES(2)
– ———————————— ——— ——————

Dorothy Leonard(3) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8,457 Common-0.0%
The Harvard University Graduate School
of Business Administration
522 Soldiers Field Road
Boston, MA 02163

W. Walker Lewis(3) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,768 Common-0.0%
535 Madison Avenue
New York, NY 10022

Frederic V. Malek(3) . . . . . . . . . . . . . 26,467 Common-0.1%
901 15th Street, N.W.
Suite 300
Washington, D.C. 20005

Frank A. Nicolai(3)(4)(8) . . . . . . . . . . . 541,154 Common-1.3%
4050 Legato Road
Fairfax, VA 22033

Charles O. Rossotti(3)(4)(9) . . . . . . . . . 1,391,428 Common-3.4%
4050 Legato Road
Fairfax, VA 22033

Alan G. Spoon(3)(10) . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,749 Common-0.0%
1150 15th Street, N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20071

All executive officers and directors . . . . . 4,032,176 Common-9.8%
as a group (twelve persons)

(1) Amount of beneficial ownership includes stock options granted to
directors and executive officers which have vested and are or will
become exercisable within 60 days of March 21, 1997. Accordingly, Mr.
Altobello has 13,218 options vested and exercisable; Mr. Brands has
37,969 options vested and exercisable; Mr. Forese has 5,999 options
vested and exercisable; Dr. Forman has 31,136 options vested and
exercisable; Mr. Giuntini has 52,866 options vested and exercisable;
Mr. Gross has 13,500 options vested and exercisable; Mr. Nicolai has
13,500 options vested and exercisable; Dr. Leonard has 833 options
vested and exercisable; Mr. Lewis has 2,249 options vested and
exercisable; Mr. Malek has 9,374 options vested and exercisable; Mr.
Spoon has 749 options vested and exercisable; and Mr. Rossotti has no
options vested and exercisable. In addition, Mr. Giuntini’s beneficial
ownership includes 27,970 vested and exercisable options granted to
Donna E. Deeley, his spouse and a Vice President of the Company. All
executive officers and directors as a group (twelve persons) have
beneficial ownership of 209,363 options vested and exercisable within
60 days of March 21, 1997.

(2) All amounts and percentages of Common Stock were calculated to include
stock options vested and exercisable for those individual directors and
executive officers who had such stock options. The number of shares of
Common Stock was calculated as of March 21, 1997.

(3) Indicates a director of the Company.

8
12
(4) Indicates an executive officer of the Company.

(5) Includes 1,125 shares beneficially owned by Mr. Altobello’s
daughter-in-law, who has the sole power to vote and dispose of such
shares. Mr. Altobello disclaims beneficial ownership with respect to
the shares owned by his daughter-in-law.

(6) Amount of beneficial ownership includes 87,634 shares and 27,970
options owned by Mr. Giuntini’s spouse, a Vice President of the
Company, who has the sole power to vote and dispose of such shares.

(7) Includes 111,375 shares beneficially owned by Mr. Gross’ wife and
30,375 shares beneficially owned by each of his two children, with
respect to which shares Mr. Gross disclaims beneficial ownership. Mrs.
Gross and the children have the sole power to vote and dispose of the
shares beneficially owned by them. Also includes 362,310 shares jointly
owned by Mr. and Mrs. Gross, who share joint power to vote and dispose
of such shares.

(8) Includes 64,124 shares beneficially owned by Ms. Nicolai with respect
to which she has sole voting and dispositive power. Mr. Nicolai
disclaims beneficial ownership with respect to the shares owned by Ms.
Nicolai.

(9) Includes 179,750 shares each owned by two trusts, totaling 359,500
shares, for the benefit of Mr. Rossotti’s daughter and son,
respectively, of which Mr. and Mrs. Rossotti are co-trustees. Mr. and
Mrs. Rossotti share joint power to vote and dispose of those shares.
Also includes 929,553 shares jointly owned by Mr. and Mrs. Rossotti,
who share joint power to vote and dispose of such shares.

(10) The shares are jointly owned by Mr. Spoon and his spouse, who share
joint power to vote and dispose of such shares.

SECTION 16(a) BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP REPORTING COMPLIANCE

Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the
“Exchange Act”), requires that the Company’s directors, executive officers, and
persons who own more than 10% of a registered class of the equity securities of
the Company (“reporting persons”) file with the Securities and Exchange
Commission initial reports of ownership, and reports of changes in ownership,
of shares of stock, and options to purchase such shares, of the Company.
Reporting persons are required by Securities and Exchange Commission rules to
furnish the Company with copies of all Section 16(a) reports they file.

Based solely upon a review of Section 16(a) reports furnished to the
Company for the fiscal year ended December 31, 1996 (the “1996 fiscal year”),
and representations by reporting persons that no other reports were required
for the 1996 fiscal year, all Section 16(a) reporting requirements were met.

9
13
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

SUMMARY COMPENSATION TABLE

The following table summarizes the compensation paid or accrued by the
Company during the three fiscal years ended December 31, 1996 to the Company’s
executive officers.



ANNUAL COMPENSATION LONG-TERM COMPENSATION
——————- ———————-
AWARDS PAYOUTS
—— ——-

SHARES
UNDERLYING
OPTIONS (NO. LTIP ALL OTHER
NAME AND PRINCIPAL POSITION YEAR SALARY BONUS(1) OF SHARES)(2) PAYOUT(3) COMPENSATION(4)
– ————————— —- —— —– ———- —— ————

Charles O. Rossotti 1996 $250,000 $ 0 0 $ 0 $7,904
Chairman of the Board of 1995 250,000 250,000 0 0 7,904
Directors and Director 1994 251,917 250,000 0 0 8,382

Patrick W. Gross 1996 290,547 0 8,850 0 7,904
Vice Chairman of the Board 1995 270,833 192,500 4,050 577,500 7,904
of Directors and Director 1994 248,767 175,000 1,350 0 7,924

Paul A. Brands 1996 301,167 0 17,700 0 7,904
Vice Chairman of the Board 1995 282,917 287,000 8,100 598,500 7,904
of Directors, Chief 1994 260,417 262,500 0 0 8,211
Executive Officer, and Director

Philip M. Giuntini 1996 301,167 0 17,700 0 7,904
President and Director 1995 282,917 287,000 8,100 598,500 7,904
1994 260,417 262,500 0 0 7,924

Frank A. Nicolai 1996 265,500 150,750 8,850 0 7,904
Executive Vice President, 1995 249,167 177,100 4,050 354,200 7,904
Secretary, Treasurer, 1994 226,667 161,000 0 0 8,292
and Director

Fred L. Forman 1996 289,975 219,000 8,850 0 7,904
Executive Vice President 1995 270,333 192,500 4,050 385,000 7,904
1994 246,667 175,000 0 0 7,924

(1) All amounts were awarded based on the achievement of annual performance
goals under single or multi-year incentive compensation plans.

(2) Each of these awards of Common Stock is associated with performance under
individual incentive compensation plans and was made by the appropriate
Board committee pursuant to a shareholder-approved stock option plan.

(3) All amounts represent the final cash payment awarded for successful
completion of multi-year performance indicators of individual incentive
compensation plans.

(4) These amounts represent the Company’s contribution to special individual
retirement accounts pursuant to the AMS Simplified Employee Pension/IRA
Plan. These numbers also include miscellaneous compensation in immaterial
amounts for several officers (less than $1,000 per person).

10
14
OPTION GRANTS IN FISCAL 1996

Shown below is information concerning stock option grants to the
Company’s executive officers who were granted options on Common Stock during
the Company’s 1996 fiscal year.



INDIVIDUAL GRANTS
————————————————————-
POTENTIAL REALIZABLE VALUE
AT ASSUMED ANNUAL RATES
NUMBER OF % OF TOTAL OF STOCK PRICE APPRECIATION
SHARES OPTIONS FOR OPTION TERM
UNDERLYING GRANTED TO EXERCISE OR COMPOUNDED ANNUALLY
OPTIONS EMPLOYEES BASE PRICE EXPIRATION —————————
NAME GRANTED IN FISCAL 1996 ($/SHARE) DATE 5% 10%
—- ——- ————– ——— ———- ——— ———


Charles O. Rossotti . . . . . . . . 0 0.0% N/A N/A $ 0 $ 0

Patrick W. Gross. . . . . . . . . . 8,100 1.1% $24.00 2/28/01 53,709 118,683
750 0.1% 26.50 4/01/01 5,491 12,133

Paul A. Brands . . . . . . . . . . 16,200 2.1% 24.00 2/28/01 107,418 237,366
1,500 0.2% 26.50 4/01/01 10,982 24,268

Philip M. Giuntini . . . . . . . . 16,200 2.1% 24.00 2/28/01 107,418 237,366
1,500 0.2% 26.50 4/01/01 10,982 24,268

Frank A. Nicolai. . . . . . . . . . 8,100 1.1% 24.00 2/28/01 53,709 118,683
750 0.1% 26.50 4/01/01 5,491 12,133

Fred L. Forman. . . . . . . . . . . 8,100 1.1% 24.00 2/28/01 53,709 118,683
750 0.1% 26.50 4/01/01 5,491 12,133

(1) Each option grant is associated with a performance-based individual
incentive compensation plan for 1994-1995 or 1996-1997 and was made by the
appropriate Board committee pursuant to a shareholder-approved stock option
plan. The options shown as expiring on February 28, 2001 became
exercisable on August 31, 1996. The options shown as expiring on April 1,
2001 will become exercisable one day prior to such expiration date. In
accordance with each incentive compensation plan, the exercise date of an
option award may be accelerated to June 30 or August 31 of the year
following the end of the performance period covered by the plan if the
Compensation Committee determines that the executive successfully completed
the plan.

(2) Each option grant was awarded with an exercise price equal to the market
value of the Common Stock on the date of grant.

11
15

AGGREGATED OPTION EXERCISES IN LAST FISCAL YEAR AND FISCAL YEAR-END VALUES

Shown below is information with respect to exercises by the Company’s
executive officers during the Company’s 1996 fiscal year of options to purchase
shares of Common Stock pursuant to the 1992 Amended and Restated Stock Option
Plan E, as amended (“1992 Plan E”), and earlier stock option plans. Also shown
is information with respect to certain unexercised options to purchase shares of
Common Stock held by the Company’s executive officers as of the end of the
Company’s 1996 fiscal year.


NUMBER
OF NUMBER OF SHARES UNDERLYING VALUE OF UNEXERCISED
SHARES UNEXERCISED OPTIONS AT IN-THE-MONEY OPTIONS AT
ACQUIRED END OF FISCAL YEAR END OF FISCAL 1996(2)
ON VALUE ——————————– —————————
NAME EXERCISE REALIZED(1) EXERCISABLE UNEXERCISABLE EXERCISABLE UNEXERCISABLE
—- ——– ——– ———— ————– ———– ————-

Charles O. Rossotti . . . . . . . . . 0 $ 0 0 0 $ 0 $ 0

Patrick W. Gross. . . . . . . . . . . 37,800 646,275 13,500 22,012 68,644 344,312

Paul A. Brands. . . . . . . . . . . . 14,444 264,330 59,231 1,500 698,228 0

Philip M. Giuntini. . . . . . . . . . 25,754 434,811 57,874 1,500 638,377 0

Frank A. Nicolai. . . . . . . . . . . 0 0 13,500 750 69,919 0

Fred L. Forman . . . . . . . . . . . . 19,068 306,726 31,135 750 347,643 0

(1) Based on the market value of the Common Stock on date of exercise (as
measured by the NASDAQ closing bid price), minus the option’s exercise
price.

(2) Based on the market value of the Common Stock on the last trading day of
1996 (as measured by the NASDAQ closing bid price of $24.50), minus the
exercise price.

LONG-TERM INCENTIVE PLAN AWARDS IN LAST FISCAL YEAR

Shown below is information on long-term incentive plans for the Company’s
executive officers, which were approved by the Compensation Committee of the
Board of Directors in 1996 for the 1996-1997 performance period. If the
performance goals set forth in the plans are met, the executive officers will
be entitled to receive the incentive compensation indicated in the table below.
Owing to the Company’s poor performance in 1996, it is not anticipated that any
incentive compensation payments will be made pursuant to these long-term
incentive plans.


PERFORMANCE OR ESTIMATED
NUMBER OTHER PERIOD UNTIL FUTURE PAYOUTS
OF SHARES MATURATION OR ————————————————
NAME(1) (#) PAYMENT THRESHOLD($) TARGET ($) MAXIMUM($)(2)
——- — ——- ————- ———- ————-

Charles O. Rossotti. . . . . . . . . . . . 0 — — — —

Patrick W. Gross. . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 1996-97 — $ 876,000 —

Paul A. Brands. . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 1996-97 $0 1,520,000 —

Philip M. Giuntini. . . . . . . . . . . . 4 1996-97 0 1,520,000 —

Frank A. Nicolai. . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 1996-97 0 402,000 —

Fred L. Forman. . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 1996-97 0 459,000 —

(1) The long-term incentive compensation plans for Messrs. Brands,
Giuntini, and Gross are based on pre-tax income targets. The long-term
incentive compensation plans for Messrs. Nicolai and Forman include
pre-tax income and non-financial goals. Mr. Rossotti’s incentive
compensation plan was based on the Company’s pre-tax performance for
fiscal 1996 only and, therefore, is not includable in this table as
long-term incentive compensation.

12
16
(2) If the Compensation Committee determines that the officer has exceeded
the performance goals set forth in his incentive compensation plan, the
Committee may increase his incentive compensation award above the
target level indicated in the preceding column. The increase would be
based on a formula related to pre-tax income, in the case of Messrs.
Brands, Giuntini, and Gross, and on the Committee’s judgment of their
achievement of their specified financial and non-financial goals, in
the case of Messrs. Nicolai and Forman.

Notwithstanding anything to the contrary set forth in any of the
Company’s previous filings under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the
Exchange Act that might incorporate future filings, including this Proxy
Statement, in whole or in part, the following report and the Performance Graph
shall not be incorporated by reference into any such filings.

COMPENSATION COMMITTEE REPORT OF EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

COMPOSITION AND RESPONSIBILITIES OF COMPENSATION COMMITTEE

The Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors is responsible for
developing and making recommendations to the Board of Directors with respect to
the Company’s compensation policies generally. It is composed entirely of
outside directors who have never served as officers of the Company or its
affiliates (the “Outside Directors”). The Compensation Committee approves the
compensation plans for the Company’s executive officers, including the Chief
Executive Officer (the “CEO”), and on an annual basis determines the
compensation to be paid to the executive officers. The Compensation Committee
is responsible for the granting and administration of stock options and
incentive compensation granted to the executive officers.

The Compensation Committee has furnished the following report for
fiscal 1996:

COMPENSATION OBJECTIVES AND PHILOSOPHY

The objectives of the Company’s executive compensation program are to
provide a level of compensation that will attract and retain executives capable
of achieving long-term success for the Company’s shareholders and to structure
their compensation packages such that a significant portion generally is tied
to the achievement of multi-year targets for pre-tax income.

EXECUTIVE OFFICER COMPENSATION

The Company’s executive compensation program consists of three main
components: (i) annual base salary, (ii) potential for an annual cash bonus and
awards of stock options based on Company pre-tax income, the profit
contribution of a particular business unit, individual performance, or some
combination of these factors, and (iii) the opportunity to earn long-term cash
and stock-based incentives which are intended to encourage the achievement of
superior results over time and to align executive officer and shareholder
interests. In addition to research and recommendations furnished by the
Company’s senior management, the Compensation Committee has relied, inter alia,
on information furnished through executive compensation surveys by a recognized
compensation consulting firm, and information known to various members of the
Board of Directors. The Compensation Committee compares salaries and other
elements of executive compensation with the compensation paid to executives in
technology and consulting firms which are actual competitors of the Company.
Few of these companies are in the Hambrecht & Quist Technology Stock Index, the
peer index chosen by the Company for comparison in the “Shareholder Return
Performance Graph” below, because their shares are not publicly traded. They
include, for example, the consulting divisions of certain Big 6 accounting
firms, other prominent consulting firms which are wholly owned subsidiaries of
publicly traded companies, and other software firms that are privately held.

The executive officers, including the CEO, are eligible for the same
benefits, including group health and life insurance and participation in the
Company’s Simplified Employee Pension/IRA Plan, as are available generally to
the Company’s professional staff, except that the executive officers do not
participate in the Company’s Profit-Sharing Plan or Employee Stock Purchase
Plan. The Company does not provide material perquisites to any of its executive
officers.

ANNUAL BASE SALARY. The Compensation Committee determines the annual
base salary of each of the Company’s executive officers, including the CEO.
Changes in base salary are generally made effective on March 1. The

13
17
same principles are applied in setting the salaries of all executive officers
to ensure that salaries are competitively established. Salaries are determined
by considering the officer’s potential duties and responsibilities within the
Company and his or her business unit, and the officer’s potential impact on the
operations and profitability of the Company. Unlike with respect to the
Company’s incentive compensation arrangements, the Compensation Committee does
not consider achievement of specific corporate performance factors in
establishing base salaries for its executive officers. In general, it is the
policy of the Company to set base salaries lower than would be typical for
comparable positions in similar firms, and to include more compensation in
incentive plans, particularly incentive compensation plans tied to multi-year
performance periods.

INCENTIVE COMPENSATION PLANS. Each executive officer of the Company
generally participates in incentive compensation plans of one to three years in
duration. These plans are similar to multi-year incentive plans in which other
members of the Company’s professional staff participate. Under such plans, the
officer is eligible for annual cash incentive awards, and cash awards which may
be made at the end of the plan if the Compensation Committee determines that
the officer has met the specified goals of the executive’s programs. Some plans
also contemplate awards of stock options under the Company’s
shareholder-approved stock option plans. Each executive officer has a plan
which details the executive officer’s goals, the primary or sole element of
which is financial performance, including targets for the Company’s pre-tax
income, or targets for profit contribution by one or more business units, or a
combination thereof. Certain executive officers also have plans which include
individual, non-financial goals.

The annual cash awards under the incentive compensation plans and the
cash portion of the award for completion of an incentive compensation plan
generally are based on multiples of a percentage of the executive officer’s
salary for the relevant fiscal period. The number of stock options which may be
awarded is determined at the time the performance goals are established. Such
number of stock options is not determined by reference to any specific criteria
other than the Company’s historical practice of awarding stock options in
connection with incentive compensation plans for certain executive officers.
Such number has been relatively consistent for multi-year plans for executive
officers for more than ten years. The exercise price of all options granted in
connection with the incentive compensation plans for the executive officers is
the fair market value of the shares on the date of grant of the option.
Achievement of the specified financial or non-financial goals for plan years
earlier than the final plan year in a multi-year plan entitles the executive to
specified interim cash payments and stock option grants, all of which are
considered advances against the multi-year incentive compensation amounts.
Such interim cash payments are significantly less than a ratable percentage of
the projected incentive compensation payable on successful completion of a
multi-year plan. For example, successful completion of the first year of a
two-year plan typically would entitle the executive to payment of 25% of target
cash incentive compensation. Stock options in connection with multi-year plans
also are granted according to a schedule specified in the plan, typically
including a small percentage of options granted at the time the plans are
approved by the Compensation Committee.

Fiscal 1996 was the first year of two-year incentive compensation plans
for Patrick W. Gross, Paul A. Brands, Philip M. Giuntini, Frank A. Nicolai,
and Fred L. Forman. Charles O. Rossotti completed a one-year incentive
compensation plan. All of these plans included the same pre-tax income target
as a financial goal. In the cases of Messrs. Nicolai and Forman, the
incentive targets also included individual goals based on their respective
areas of responsibility, such as achieving operational goals within budget,
improving the Company’s administrative processes, and expanding the Company’s
Achieving Breakthrough Performance program. All plans required that a minimum
percentage of the stated goal must be achieved before any portion of the
related incentive compensation share was payable. The plans also took into
account projected pre-tax income for the year following the performance year
just ended in determining whether awards are payable and the amounts thereof.
Each plan also included higher award multiples for performance which exceeded
the targets by a stated percentage.

In February 1997, the Compensation Committee determined that since the
Company did not meet its financial goals for 1996, no incentive compensation
based on financial goals would be awarded to any executive officer of the
Company. The Compensation Committee determined that Messrs. Nicolai and Forman
had substantially met their non-financial performance goals, and determined
that Mr. Nicolai had earned 75% of his target cash payment and Mr. Forman had
earned 100% of his target cash payment. These amounts are shown in the Summary
Compensation Table under “Annual Compensation — Bonus.” The Compensation
Committee in February 1997 also decided not to grant stock options to Messrs.
Brands, Giuntini, Gross, Nicolai, or Forman because the Company did not achieve
the financial performance specified in their incentive compensation plans. Mr.
Rossotti’s 1996 compensation plan did not provide for stock options. Also in
February 1997, the Compensation Committee decided not to

14
18
increase the 1997 annual base salary of any executive officer of the Company
except Mr. Forman.

POLICY ON DEDUCTIBILITY OF COMPENSATION

Under Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended
(the “Internal Revenue Code”), the allowable deduction for compensation paid or
accrued with respect to persons who as of the end of the year are employed as
the chief executive officer and each of the four most highly compensated
executive officers of a publicly held corporation is limited to no more than
$1,000,000 per year for fiscal years beginning on or after January 1, 1994.
This limitation does not apply to compensation consisting of stock options
issuable under 1992 Plan E or Plan F, nor to compensation payable under certain
performance-based compensation plans approved by shareholders. The
Compensation Committee has taken certain actions to minimize the adverse
effects of Section 162(m) on the after-tax income of the Company. In
particular, as recommended by the Compensation Committee, the Incentive
Compensation Plan for Executive Officers was presented to and approved by the
shareholders at the 1994 annual meeting of shareholders of the Company, and all
new grants to executive officers of incentive compensation based on financial
performance are covered by the 1996 Incentive Compensation Plan for Executive
Officers (the “IC Plan”), which was approved by the shareholders at the 1996
annual meeting of shareholders of the Company. The IC Plan significantly
limits the Compensation Committee’s discretion regarding the amount of
incentive compensation paid to an employee covered by such Plan. Accordingly,
not all incentive compensation payable to executive officers is paid pursuant
to the IC Plan. The Compensation Committee projects that it is unlikely that
deductions will be lost as a result of this practice. The Compensation
Committee will continue to monitor whether compensation which is limited by
Section 162(m) is likely to exceed the deduction limitations under Section
162(m), and the Compensation Committee is expected to take appropriate actions
to reduce the likelihood of a loss of deductions.

CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER COMPENSATION

The Chief Executive Officer’s annual base salary is established by the
Compensation Committee using the same criteria as discussed above for the
executive officers. Paul Brands, who has served as Chief Executive Officer of
the Company since September 1993, received an annual base salary of $304,000
for 1996, which represented an increase of approximately 6% over his base
salary for 1995. The Compensation Committee did not base this increase on any
specific corporate performance factors. Mr. Brands’ annual incentive
compensation payments are determined by the Compensation Committee based
entirely on targets for the Company’s pre-tax income. Mr. Brands did not meet
those targets for fiscal year 1996, as determined by the Compensation Committee
in February 1997, and consequently, he did not receive an incentive
compensation payment or stock option award based on 1996 performance. The
Compensation Committee also decided not to increase Mr. Brands’ annual base
salary for 1997.

Frederic V. Malek (Chairman)
Daniel J. Altobello
James J. Forese
Dorothy Leonard
W. Walker Lewis
Alan G. Spoon

15
19
SHAREHOLDER RETURN PERFORMANCE GRAPH

The following graph provides a comparison of the cumulative total
return on the Common Stock with returns on the Standard & Poor’s 500 Composite
Index and the Computer Software Sector Index of the Hambrecht & Quist
Technology Stock Index.

[GRAPH]



=================================================================================================================
12/31/91 12/31/92 12/31/93 12/31/94 12/31/95 12/31/96
—————————————————————————————————————–

AMSY Common Stock 100 169 150 219 342 419
—————————————————————————————————————–
S&P 500 Composite Index 100 108 119 120 165 203
—————————————————————————————————————–
Hambrecht & Quist Technology/Software 100 112 120 151 217 263
=================================================================================================================

16
20
COMMITTEES OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS

The Company has a standing Executive Committee, Stock Option/Award
Committee, Compensation Committee, and Audit Committee. The Company does not
have a standing Nominating Committee.

The Executive Committee is presently composed of five directors, all of
whom are executive officers of the Company: Charles O. Rossotti, Patrick W.
Gross, Paul A. Brands, Philip M. Giuntini, and Frank A. Nicolai. The Executive
Committee generally has the power to authorize all corporate actions that the
Board of Directors has the power to authorize, except as may be limited by law.
The Executive Committee met once during 1996.

The Stock Option/Award Committee is presently composed of five
directors, all of whom are executive officers of the Company: Charles O.
Rossotti, Patrick W. Gross, Paul A. Brands, Philip M. Giuntini, and Frank A.
Nicolai. The Stock Option/Award Committee administers the Company’s employee
stock option plans, except as noted below. These directors are eligible to
receive options under the plans, but options, if any, awarded to them are
granted and administered by the Compensation Committee. The Stock Option/Award
Committee also administers the Company’s Profit-Sharing Plan, a stock award
plan. Directors and executive officers are not eligible to participate in the
Profit-Sharing Plan. The Stock Option/Award Committee meets as required and
met twice during 1996.

The Compensation Committee is presently composed of six Outside
Directors: Daniel J. Altobello, James J. Forese, Dorothy Leonard, W. Walker
Lewis, Frederic V. Malek, and Alan G. Spoon. Mr. Malek is Chairman of the
Compensation Committee. The Compensation Committee is responsible for
developing and making recommendations to the Board of Directors with respect to
the Company’s compensation policies generally. The Compensation Committee
approves the compensation plans for the Company’s executive officers, including
the Chief Executive Officer, and on an annual basis determines the compensation
to be paid to the executive officers. The Compensation Committee alone is
responsible for the granting and administration of stock options granted to the
executive officers and to the Controller. In 1996, the Compensation Committee
met twice.

The Audit Committee is presently composed of three Outside Directors:
Daniel J. Altobello, James J. Forese, and Dorothy Leonard. Mr. Forese is
Chairman of the Audit Committee. This Committee has the responsibility for
making recommendations to the Board of Directors as to the independent
accountants of the Company; for reviewing with the independent accountants,
upon completion of their audit, the scope of their examination, any
recommendations they may have for improving internal accounting controls,
management systems, or choice of accounting principles, and other matters; and
for reviewing generally the accounting control procedures of the Company. In
1996, the Audit Committee met three times. Also, on the recommendation of the
Audit Committee, the Board of Directors has appointed the accounting firm of
Price Waterhouse LLP to audit the accounts of the Company for the fiscal year
ending December 31, 1997.

The Board of Directors met five times during 1996, and all members
attended 100% of the meetings of the Board and Committees of the Board on which
they serve. Outside Directors are currently entitled to receive fees of $5,000
per Board meeting attended, plus travel expenses, and such fees and expenses
were, in fact, paid for all meetings attended during fiscal 1996. In addition,
Outside Directors were paid a retainer of $5,000 per year during fiscal 1996.
Under the Company’s Outside Directors Stock-for-Fees Plan (the “Stock-for-Fees
Plan”), which was approved by shareholders in May 1995, Outside Directors can
elect to have the annual meeting fees and retainer, which would otherwise be
paid to the Outside Directors in cash, paid in the form of Common Stock. W.
Walker Lewis elected to have his annual meeting fees for three of the Board
meetings he attended during 1996 paid in the form of Common Stock pursuant to
the Stock for Fees Plan.

Outside Directors also receive automatic grants of stock options, which
vest over five years, pursuant to the Company’s stock option plans. The number
of shares subject to grant, and subject to outstanding options, are adjusted
when stock splits occur. The numbers of options reported below in this
paragraph are the numbers of the original grants and do not give effect to the
June 1992, October 1994, or January 1996 stock splits to the extent such splits
occurred after the date of grant. All options granted to Outside Directors
vest at the rate of 1/60th a month for each month the Outside Director
continues to serve as a director. Pursuant to a prior stock option plan, each
Outside Director in May 1988 was granted 5,000 options to purchase shares of
the Common Stock. James J. Forese, who became a director in November 1989, was
granted 5,000 options on November 10, 1989. Dorothy Leonard, who became a
director in September 1991, was granted 5,000 options on September 27, 1991.
Under 1992 Plan E, each new Outside Director was automatically granted 5,000
options (such number subject to adjustments for splits) upon

17
21
first becoming a director, and each Outside Director was automatically granted
an additional 5,000 options (such number subject to adjustments for splits),
vesting over 5 years, when any options previously granted have fully vested.
Plan F provides for the grant of the same amount of options to Outside
Directors. Pursuant to 1992 Plan E, Daniel J. Altobello was granted 7,500
options on July 27, 1993 when he first became a director, and Frederic V. Malek
was granted 5,000 options in April 1993 because his options granted in 1988 had
fully vested. The grant to Mr. Malek was made subject to shareholder approval,
which was obtained in May 1993. In addition, under 1992 Plan E, Mr. Forese was
granted 7,500 options (after giving effect to the October 1994 stock split) in
November 1994 because his options granted in 1988 had fully vested, and W.
Walker Lewis was granted 5,000 options on December 1, 1995 when he became a
director. Most recently, Dr. Leonard was granted 5,000 options under 1992 Plan
E in August 1996 because her options granted in 1991 had fully vested, and Alan
G. Spoon was granted 5,000 options under 1992 Plan E in September 1996 when he
became a director.

COMPENSATION COMMITTEE INTERLOCKS AND
INSIDER PARTICIPATION

Frederic V. Malek, James J. Forese, Dorothy Leonard, Daniel J.
Altobello, and W. Walker Lewis served as members of the Compensation Committee
throughout fiscal 1996. Alan G. Spoon became a member of the Compensation
Committee in September 1996 when he was elected to the Board of Directors. The
Compensation Committee is presently composed of Messrs. Malek, Forese,
Altobello, Lewis, and Spoon and Dr. Leonard. Mr. Malek is Chairman of the
Compensation Committee.

During 1996, there were no Compensation Committee interlocks, and there
was no insider participation in the executive compensation decisions of the
Company.

CERTAIN TRANSACTIONS

Shaw, Pittman, Potts & Trowbridge, general counsel to the Company,
earned fees and incurred reimbursable expenses totaling approximately
$2,910,422 from AMS in connection with legal services performed for the Company
during 1996. Barbara M. Rossotti, a member of the firm of Shaw, Pittman, Potts
& Trowbridge, is the spouse of Charles O. Rossotti, Chairman of the Board and a
director of the Company.

PROPOSAL TO APPROVE
1996 AMENDED STOCK OPTION PLAN F

INTRODUCTION AND SUMMARY DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED AMENDMENTS

The Company’s 1996 Stock Option Plan F was adopted by the Board of
Directors on April 3, 1996, and was approved by the Company’s shareholders on
May 10, 1996 at the 1996 annual meeting of the shareholders of the Company.
The Company’s shareholders are now being asked to approve 1996 Amended Stock
Option Plan F, which was adopted by the Board of Directors on February 21,
1997, subject to shareholder approval. If so approved, 1996 Amended Stock
Option Plan F would implement a number of amendments to 1996 Stock Option Plan
F (the “1996 Plan F Amendments” or the “Amendments”). The 1996 Plan F
Amendments provide that vested nonqualified stock options (“NSOs”) held by an
employee who resigns following completion of ten (10) or more years of
continuous service as an employee would expire one (1) year after the date of
the termination of the employee’s employment, rather than thirty (30) days
after termination of employment. The 1996 Plan F Amendments also provide that
vested NSOs held by an Outside Director whose service as a director terminates
by reason of death, disability or resignation as an Outside Director following
completion of ten (10) years of continuous service, which would expire by their
terms under the version of Plan F currently in effect, would instead expire no
later than the date one (1) year after the date of termination of the Outside
Director’s service as a director. Finally, in response to recent amendments to
regulations issued by the Securities and Exchange Commission under Section 16
of the Exchange Act and by the Internal Revenue Service under Section 162(m) of
the Internal Revenue Code, the Amendments would (i) alter the requirements for
membership on the committee charged with making and administering

18
22
awards under Plan F to “covered employees” within the meaning of Section 162(m)
of the Internal Revenue Code and to officers and directors subject to Section
16 of the Exchange Act, and (ii) modify the scope of amendments to Plan F and
the terms of options issued thereunder that may be made by the Board of
Directors without shareholder approval.

The Board of Directors believes that the 1996 Plan F Amendments will
further the purposes of Plan F, which are: (i) to offer to those employees who
contribute materially to the successful operation of the Company additional
incentive and encouragement to remain in the employ of the Company by
increasing their personal participation in the Company through stock ownership,
(ii) to provide an alternative means of compensating key employees whose
performances contribute significantly to the success of the Company, and (iii)
to attract and retain directors who have not at any time been officers or
employees of the Company (i.e., Outside Directors) and to compensate such
Outside Directors for service to the Company.

The text of Plan F, as proposed to be amended (the “Proposed Plan”) and
incorporating the proposed 1996 Plan F Amendments in italics, is set forth in
Exhibit A to this Proxy Statement, and the following description of such Plan
is qualified by reference to such text.

SUMMARY DESCRIPTION OF PLAN F

Stock Option Plan F provides that options to purchase Common Stock may
be granted to any key employee (including officers and directors) of the
Company and its subsidiaries who meets minimum salary and other requirements
established by the Board of Directors. “Outside Directors” also are eligible
to receive options under Plan F. Stock Option Plan F defines “Outside
Directors” as directors who have not at any time been officers or employees of
the Company. As of March 21, 1997, 1,613 key employees (i.e., six executive
officers, 146 Vice Presidents, 323 Senior Principals, and 1,138 Principals,
including persons in comparable positions) and six Outside Directors were
eligible to participate in Plan F.

Stock Option Plan F provides that it shall be administered by the Board
of Directors or the Stock Option/Award Committee, except as provided below.
The Stock Option/Award Committee currently performs this function. In
accordance with the provisions of Stock Option Plan F, the Stock Option/Award
Committee has authority to determine the employees to be granted options,
whether the options are NSOs or incentive stock options (“ISOs”), the times at
which options are granted, the exercise prices of the options, the numbers of
shares subject to the options, the vesting schedule of the options or whether
the options are immediately vested, the times when options terminate, and
whether the exercise price will be paid in cash or stock.

Under Plan F, as currently in effect (the “Current Plan”), a committee
composed of two or more Outside Directors, each of whom is required to be a
“disinterested person” within the meaning of prior Rule 16b-3 as promulgated
under Section 16(b) of the Exchange Act, has sole authority (i) to grant
options to directors, other than Outside Directors, and to all persons who are
“officers” or “ten percent shareholders” of the Company within the meaning of
Section 16 of the Exchange Act, and (ii) to perform all other functions with
respect to options granted to those persons, including amendments to Stock
Option Plan F or outstanding options which affect such persons. Under the
Proposed Plan, a committee composed of at least two “non-employee directors,”
within the meaning of Rule 16b-3(b)(3) as adopted by Securities and Exchange
Commission on August 15, 1996, who also are “outside directors” within the
meaning of Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code, would have the
authority (i) to make awards to directors of the Company who are not Outside
Directors, to persons who are “officers” of the Company, as defined for
purposes of Section 16 of the Exchange Act, and to “covered employees,” within
the meaning of Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code, and (ii) to perform
all other functions of the Board or the Stock Option/Award Committee with
respect to outstanding awards to any of such directors, officers, and covered
employees, including, without limitation, amendments to Stock Option Plan F or
outstanding options which affect such persons. The Compensation Committee
currently performs these functions with respect to the persons specified in the
preceding sentences (who are currently the Company’s executive officers and
Controller).

Options may be granted to key employees either (a) on the basis of
awards earned under the Company’s incentive compensation programs for groups of
key employees, or (b) as the Board of Directors or the appropriate Committee
may determine. If options are granted in connection with the Company’s
incentive compensation programs, then performance bonuses and options based
thereon are earned based on the employee’s success in meeting predetermined
performance standards during one or more years (the “Performance Period”).
Such options are

19
23
granted, if at all, at the time that the Company determines that the employee
has met or will meet the employee’s predetermined performance standards for the
Performance Period in question.

The award of options to Outside Directors under Stock Option Plan F is
non-discretionary. NSOs for 5,000 shares will be granted automatically to any
new Outside Director on the date of the Outside Director’s first election or
appointment to the Board. Following completion of five years of service as an
Outside Director, each Outside Director will receive an additional grant of
5,000 shares. One sixtieth of such options vest on the date of election or
appointment of each such Outside Director to the Board, and 1/60th vest on the
last day of each month thereafter for as long as the person continues to serve
as a director. Stock Option Plan F provides that options granted to all
directors, officers and ten percent shareholders (as defined for purposes of
Section 16 of the Exchange Act) are not exercisable for a period of at least
six months from the date of grant.

Stock Option Plan F authorizes the issuance of options to purchase a
maximum of 3,800,000 shares, subject to adjustment for future capital changes.
Of this number, 2,980,000 shares remain available as of March 21, 1997 for
issuance pursuant to options granted thereunder. Shares subject to options
granted under Stock Option Plan F which terminate or expire unexercised are
available for the grant of future options. The number of shares which may be
subject to options granted under Stock Option Plan F in any single calendar
year for awards earned for one-year Performance Periods may not exceed 200,000
shares, subject to possible adjustment for capital changes. There is no annual
limitation on options granted with respect to awards earned for Performance
Periods of more than one year. However, the maximum number of shares which may
be subject to options granted under Plan F to any “covered employee,” as
defined in Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code, during the life of such
Plan is 100,000 shares, subject to adjustment for future capital changes.

Under Stock Option Plan F, NSOs are exercisable only to the extent they
are vested. For employees, the Board of Directors or the appropriate Committee
selects a vesting schedule over a period of up to five years or provides for
vesting upon the attainment of specified performance goals or other events.
Optionees who receive NSOs are entitled to exercise at any time, or from time
to time, all or any portion of a vested NSO; provided, however, that all NSOs
expire no later than five years after the date of grant. The exercise price of
all NSOs granted under Stock Option Plan F, except those options granted in
connection with one-year incentive compensation plans, is the fair market value
of the Common Stock on the date of grant of the option. NSOs granted in
connection with one-year incentive compensation plans may be granted with
exercise prices other than the fair market value of the Common Stock on the
date of grant only if the exercise price is determined by a formula selected by
the Board (or the appropriate Committee) that is based on the fair market value
of the Common Stock, as of a date, or over a period, that is within three
months of the date of grant.

Under Stock Option Plan F, ISOs are exercisable only to the extent they
are vested. ISOs vest over a period of up to seven years. Employees who have
been granted ISOs may exercise at any time, or from time to time, all or any
portion of a vested ISO. ISOs expire up to eight years after the date they are
granted. The exercise price of ISOs is determined by the appropriate Committee
and must be at least equal to the fair market value of the Common Stock on the
date the ISO is granted (except ISOs granted to ten percent shareholders, in
which case the price may not be less than 110% of fair market value).

For purposes of Stock Option Plan F, the fair market value of the
Common Stock is the closing bid price of the Common Stock as quoted in the
National Association of Securities Dealers Automated Quotation System
(“NASDAQ”) in the national market on the date of grant of the option, or, if
there is no trade on such date, on the most recent date upon which the Common
Stock was traded. On March 21, 1997, the closing bid price of the Common Stock
was $21.00 per share. Options granted to employees may be amended to advance
the date on which the option vests. If an option is so amended, the amendment
also may provide that the shares which would not have been vested under the
original vesting schedule shall be subject to repurchase for a period of time
by the Company at the original exercise price upon termination of employment of
the employee for any reason. If the Company is merged, consolidated, sold,
liquidated, or dissolved, Stock Option Plan F also provides for the automatic
acceleration of the vesting of options which would have vested within one year
of any such event.

An option is exercised by giving written notice to the Company,
specifying the full number of shares of Common Stock to be purchased and
tendering payment to the Company of the exercise price. Payment for shares
issued upon the exercise of an option may consist of cash or delivery of a
properly executed exercise notice,

20
24
together with irrevocable instructions to a broker to promptly deliver to the
Company the number of sales or loan proceeds required to pay the exercise
price. Under Stock Option Plan F, the Board of Directors or the appropriate
Committee also has the authority to permit an optionee to pay the exercise
price for shares using shares of the Common Stock owned for at least six
months, or a combination of cash and such previously-owned stock.

An option is not transferable during the lifetime of the optionee,
other than by will, by the laws of descent and distribution, or pursuant to a
qualified domestic relations order (“QDRO”). Unless transferred under a QDRO,
an option is exercisable during the optionee’s lifetime only by the optionee.
Upon termination of an employee’s employment with the Company for any reason
whatsoever, all options held by such employee which are not exercisable on the
date of such termination shall expire. If the Board of Directors or the
appropriate Committee determines that an employee has committed certain defined
acts of misconduct such as embezzlement, fraud, dishonesty, breach of fiduciary
duty or deliberate disregard of the Company’s rules resulting in loss, damage
or injury to the Company, neither the employee nor his or her estate would be
entitled to exercise any option whatsoever.

To the extent NSOs held by an employee are exercisable upon an
employee’s termination of employment, shares subject to NSOs held by such
employee may be purchased during the “exercise period,” after which the NSOs
shall expire and all rights granted under the agreement pursuant to which the
options were granted shall become null and void. Under the Current Plan, the
“exercise period” for shares subject to NSOs held by such employee, his or her
heirs, legatees or legal representatives, as the case may be, ends on the
earlier of (i) the date on which the NSO expires by its terms, or (ii) (A)
except in the case of death or disability, within thirty (30) days, or (B) in
the case of death or disability, within one year after the date of termination
of employment. Under the Proposed Plan, the “exercise period” for such shares
would end on the earlier of (i) the date on which the NSO expires by its terms,
or (ii) (A) except in the case of death, disability, or resignation as an
employee following completion of ten (10) or more years of continuous service
as an employee, thirty (30) days after the date of the employee’s termination
of employment, or (B) in the case of death, disability, or resignation as an
employee following completion of ten (10) or more years of continuous service,
one (1) year after the date of the employee’s termination of employment.

Upon termination of an Outside Director as a member of the Board of
Directors for any reason other than certain retirement events, death or
disability, all options held by such Outside Director which are not exercisable
on the date of such termination shall expire. Under the Current Plan, in the
event of termination by reason of death or disability, all options then
unvested would vest automatically, all options would be exercisable by the
Outside Director, his or her heirs, legatees, or legal representatives, as the
case may be, at any time until the date on which the options expire by their
original terms. In addition, the Current Plan provides that termination of an
Outside Director’s membership on the Board of Directors by reason of retirement
after completion of at least ten (10) years of continuous service will extend
vesting and exercisability of such Director’s options. Options unvested on the
date of retirement will continue to vest at the rate of 1/60th per month for so
long as such Director survives, and vested options will be exercisable at any
time until the date on which all such options expire by their original terms,
five years from the date of grant. Under the Proposed Plan, upon the
termination of an Outside Director as a member of the Board of Directors for
the reason of resignation as an Outside Director following completion of at
least ten (10) years of continuous service as an Outside Director, death or
disability, the “exercise period” for shares subject to NSO held by such
Outside Director, his heirs, legatees, or legal representatives, as the case
may be, would end on the earlier of (i) the date on which the NSO expires by
its terms, or (ii) the date one (1) year after the date of termination of such
Outside Director’s service as a member of the Board of Directors.

All ISOs held by an employee will expire unless exercised by the
employee, his or her heirs, legatees or legal representatives, as the case may
be, before the earlier of (1) the date on which the ISO expires by its terms,
or (2)(a) except in the case of death or disability, within thirty (30) days
after the date employment is terminated, or (b) in the case of death or
disability, within one year after the date of termination of employment. In no
event will a granted and outstanding ISO expire more than three months after
the date of the employee’s termination of employment.

Under the Current Plan, the Board of Directors may, at any time, amend
Stock Option Plan F or the terms of options granted under such Plan, except
that no amendment may, without approval of the shareholders, (i) materially
increase the benefits accruing to the participants under the Plan, (ii)
increase the number of shares which may be issued under the Plan, except for
adjustments in certain circumstances, or (iii) materially modify the
requirements as to eligibility for participation in the Plan. The Proposed
Plan would permit the Board, at any time, to amend

21
25
Stock Option Plan F or the terms of options granted under such Plan, except
that no amendment may, without approval of the shareholders, (i) modify the
requirements as to the exercise price of stock options, (ii) increase the
number of shares which may be issued under the Plan, except for adjustments in
certain circumstances, (iii) materially modify the requirements as to
eligibility for participation in the Plan, or (iv) materially modify the terms
of the Plan as to “covered employees” within the meaning of Section 162(m) of
the Internal Revenue Code. The Current Plan also provides that an amendment to
an option granted to an Outside Director may not be made more frequently than
every six months unless necessary to comply with the Internal Revenue Code or
the Employee Retirement and Income Security Act of 1974, as amended. The
Proposed Plan would eliminate this restriction.

Plan F shall remain in effect until January 1, 2006.

TAX CONSEQUENCES

Information regarding the federal income tax consequences to the
Company and to optionees of options granted under Stock Option Plan F follows.
This information is not intended to be exhaustive and is only intended to
briefly summarize the federal income tax statutes, regulations and currently
available agency interpretations thereof, and is intended to apply to Stock
Option Plan F as normally operated. It is recommended that optionees consult
their own professional tax advisors for personal and specific advice about
options.

An optionee has no tax consequences from the grant of an NSO. Upon
exercise of an NSO, the optionee has compensation income taxable at ordinary
income tax rates on the amount by which the fair market value of the shares
received as of the date of exercise exceeds the exercise price. The Company is
entitled to a deduction equal to the amount of compensation income to the
optionee as long as income taxes are withheld on the optionee’s compensation
income. Upon the sale of Common Stock acquired through the exercise of an NSO,
any difference between the amount realized and the fair market value of the
Common Stock as of the date of exercise will be capital gain or loss.

An employee is not taxed upon the grant of an ISO. Except for the
possible imposition of the alternative minimum tax, an optionee is not taxable
on the exercise of an ISO. Unlike the exercise of an NSO, the Company is not
entitled to a deduction with respect to an ISO unless the optionee engaged in a
disqualifying disposition described below. Upon a sale of shares acquired upon
exercise of an ISO, the employee will recognize capital gain or loss, as the
case may be, equal to the difference between the amount realized on the sale
and the exercise price, provided the sale occurs at least two years after the
grant of the ISO and at least one year after the exercise of the ISO. If these
holding periods are not satisfied, the sale of shares acquired upon exercise of
an ISO is a “disqualifying disposition.” If the sale is a disqualifying
disposition, the excess of the fair market value of the shares on the date the
ISO was exercised over the exercise price is compensation income taxable at
ordinary income tax rates, and any excess of the sale price of the shares over
the fair market value of the shares on the date the ISO was exercised would be
capital gain. The Company would be entitled to a deduction equal to the amount
of compensation income taxable to the optionee. The excess of the fair market
value of the shares at the time of exercise over the exercise price of the ISO
increases the optionee’s alternative minimum taxable income.

If an optionee who is subject to the “short-swing profit liability”
rules under Section 16(b) of the Exchange Act purchases shares of Common Stock
within six months before the optionee exercises an NSO or an ISO, the tax
consequences of exercising the option which normally occur on the option
exercise date may be delayed for up to six months. In such a case, unless the
optionee makes an election under Section 83(b) of the Internal Revenue Code to
avoid the delay, the tax consequences which normally occur on the exercise date
of an ISO or NSO will occur on the first date on which a sale of the shares of
Common Stock acquired upon exercise of the option would not subject the
optionee to liability under Section 16(b) of the Exchange Act.

NEW PLAN BENEFITS

The number of stock options that would have been granted during the
Company’s 1996 fiscal year to each of the following persons or groups had the
Proposed Plan been in effect would not differ from the number which was in fact
granted under 1992 Plan E, as set forth below.

22
26



POTENTIAL REALIZABLE
VALUE AT ASSUMED
ANNUAL RATES OF
STOCK PRICE
APPRECIATION FOR
OPTION TERM
COMPOUNDED ANNUALLY(1)
—————————
NAME AND POSITION 5% 10% NUMBER OF UNITS(2)
—————– ———- ———– —————

Charles O. Rossotti………………………………………………. $ 0 $ 0 0
Chairman of the Board of Directors and Director

Patrick W. Gross…………………………………………………. 59,200 130,817 8,850
Vice Chairman of the Board of Directors and Director

Paul A. Brands…………………………………………………… 118,400 261,634 17,700
Vice Chairman of the Board of Directors, Chief Executive Officer, and
Director

Philip M. Giuntini……………………………………………….. 118,400 261,634 17,700
President and Director

Frank A. Nicolai…………………………………………………. 59,200 130,817 8,850
Executive Vice President, Secretary, Treasurer, and Director

Fred L. Forman…………………………………………………… 59,200 130,817 8,850
Executive Vice President

All current executive officers as a group…………………………… 414,400 915,719 61,950

All current directors who are not executive officers as a group……….. 73,559 162,548 10,000

All employees who are not executive officers as a group………………. 5,436,563 12,323,041 697,501

(1) The potential realizable value is calculated based on the term of the
option at its time of grant. It is calculated by assuming that the stock
price on the date of grant appreciates at the indicated annual rate,
compounded annually for the entire term of the option, and that the option
is exercised and the shares are sold on the last day of its term for the
appreciated stock price. Such values do not include consideration of
income tax consequences.

(2) Options which were granted during the Company’s 1996 fiscal year pursuant
to 1992 Plan E.

VOTE REQUIRED

The affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the shares of
Common Stock present at the Annual Meeting or represented by Proxy and entitled
to vote to approve 1996 Amended Stock Option Plan F is required for approval of
such Plan. The Board of Directors has unanimously adopted a resolution
approving 1996 Amended Stock Option Plan F and directed that it be submitted to
the shareholders for their consideration. The members of the Board of
Directors and the Company’s executive officers have advised the Company that
they intend to vote all shares in their control in favor of 1996 Amended Stock
Option Plan F. In the event that 1996 Amended Stock Option Plan F is not
approved by the shareholders of the Company at the Annual Meeting, the Board of
Directors will reconsider the Amendments.

THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS A VOTE FOR APPROVAL
OF 1996 AMENDED STOCK OPTION PLAN F

23
27
OTHER MATTERS

A representative from Price Waterhouse LLP, independent public
accountants to the Company, is expected to be present at the Annual Meeting,
will have an opportunity to make a statement should the representative desire
to do so, and is expected to be available to respond to appropriate questions
during such Meeting.

The Board of Directors does not know of any matters to be presented at
the Annual Meeting other than those stated above. If any other business should
come before the Annual Meeting, including a vote to adjourn such Meeting, the
persons named in the enclosed Proxy will vote thereon at the Meeting, or any
adjournment thereof, as he or they determine to be in the best interests of the
Company.

To be included in the Proxy Statement and form of Proxy for the 1998
annual meeting, shareholder proposals intended to be presented at that meeting
must be received by the Company no later than December 12, 1997.

ANNUAL REPORT

A copy of the 1996 Annual Report of the Company (which includes
condensed financial data and a letter to stockholders) accompanies this Proxy
Statement. Appendix 1 to this Proxy Statement, titled “1996 Financial Report,”
contains all of the financial information (including the Company’s audited
financial statements), and certain general information, previously published in
the Company’s Annual Report. Appendix 1 is incorporated herein by reference. A
copy of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K may be obtained without charge
by writing to Frank A. Nicolai, Secretary, American Management Systems,
Incorporated, 4050 Legato Road, Fairfax, Virginia 22033.

BY ORDER OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS,

Frank A. Nicolai
Secretary

April 11, 1997
Fairfax, Virginia

SHAREHOLDERS WHO DO NOT EXPECT TO ATTEND THE MEETING ARE REMINDED TO
DATE, SIGN, AND RETURN THE ENCLOSED PROXY IN THE POSTAGE-PAID ENVELOPE
PROVIDED.

24
28
EXHIBIT A

AMERICAN MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS, INCORPORATED
1996 AMENDED STOCK OPTION PLAN F
AS IN EFFECT ON MARCH 21, 1997

(as Amended February 21, 1997, such Amendment
Subject to Shareholder Approval)

I. PURPOSES

There are three purposes of 1996 Stock Option Plan F (the “Plan”). The
first is to offer to those employees who contribute materially to the
successful operation of AMERICAN MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS, INCORPORATED (the
“Corporation”) additional incentive and encouragement to remain in the employ
of the Corporation by increasing their personal participation in the
Corporation through stock ownership. The second purpose is to provide an
alternative means of compensating key employees whose performances contribute
significantly to the success of the Corporation. The third is to attract and
retain directors who have not at any time been officers or employees of the
Corporation (“Outside Directors”) and to compensate such Outside Directors for
service to the Corporation. The Plan provides a means whereby optionees may
purchase shares of the $0.01 par value common stock of the Corporation (the
“Common Stock”) pursuant to options. The options may be either one of two
types, (1) “incentive stock options” which will qualify as such under Section
422 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”), or under any
applicable successor statute, or (2) “nonqualified stock options,” that is,
options which are not intended to qualify as incentive stock options under
Section 422 of the Code.

II. ADMINISTRATION

Except as otherwise provided in this Section 2, the Plan shall be
implemented and administered by the Board of Directors of the Corporation (the
“Board”) or a Stock Option/Award Committee (the “Committee”) appointed by the
Board and composed of three or more directors of the Corporation.

The Committee may be delegated the authority and discretion to adopt
and revise such rules and regulations as it shall deem necessary for the
administration of the Plan, and to determine, consistent with the provisions of
the Plan, the employees to be granted options, whether such options shall be
nonqualified stock options or incentive stock options, the times at which
options shall be granted, the exercise price of the shares subject to each
option (subject to paragraph D of Section 6), the number of shares subject to
each option, the vesting schedule of options or whether the options shall be
immediately vested, the times when options shall terminate, and whether the
exercise price of options shall be paid in cash or stock. Acts of a majority
of the members of the Committee at a meeting at which a quorum is present, or
acts approved in writing by a majority of the members of the Committee, shall
be the valid acts of the Committee. The Committee’s actions, including any
interpretation or construction of any provisions of the Plan or any option
granted hereunder, shall be final, conclusive and binding unless otherwise
determined by the Board at its next regularly scheduled meeting. No member of
the Board or the Committee shall be liable for any action or determination made
in good faith with respect to the Plan or any option granted under it.

Notwithstanding any other provision of this Section or the Plan or any
documentation governing incentive compensation plans pursuant to which officers
may elect to receive options under this Plan, a committee composed of at least
two Non-Employee Directors, within the meaning of Rule 16b-3(b)(3) of the
Securities and Exchange Commission who also are “outside directors” within the
meaning of Section 162(m) of the Code, shall have the authority (a) to make
awards to directors of the Corporation who are not Outside Directors, to all
persons who are “officers” of the Corporation as defined for purposes of
Sections 16(a) and 16(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended
(the “Act”), and to “covered employees,” within the meaning of Section 162(m)
of the Code and (b) to perform all other functions of the Board or Committee
with respect to outstanding awards to any of such directors, officers, and
covered employees including without limitation amendments to this Plan or such
outstanding awards which affect such persons. Further, notwithstanding any
other provision of this Section or the Plan, all awards made to Outside
Directors shall be automatic and nondiscretionary as set forth in the Plan.

A-1
29
III. ELIGIBILITY; PARTICIPATION; SPECIAL LIMITATIONS

All key employees (including officers and directors) of the
Corporation, or any corporation in which the Corporation owns stock possessing
more than 50 percent of the voting power ( a “Subsidiary”), who meet minimum
salary and other requirements established by the Board, shall be eligible to
receive options under the Plan. All Outside Directors also shall be eligible
to receive options under the Plan. An employee who has been granted an option
may be granted an additional option or options or rights under the Plan if the
Committee or the Board shall so determine. The granting of an option under the
Plan shall not affect any outstanding stock option previously granted to an
employee under the Plan or any other plan of the Corporation.

Nothing contained in the Plan, or in any option granted pursuant to the
Plan, shall (i) confer upon any employee the right to continued employment, or
shall interfere in any way with the right of the Corporation or a Subsidiary to
terminate the employment of such employee at any time or (ii) confer upon any
Outside Director the right to continued membership on the Board of Directors,
or shall interfere in any way with the right of the Corporation to terminate
the membership on the Board of Directors of such Outside Director.

In no event, however, shall an incentive stock option be granted to any
person who then owns (as that term is defined in Section 424 of the Code) stock
possessing more than 10% of the total combined voting power of all classes of
stock of the Corporation or of any of its Subsidiaries, unless the exercise
price as determined under paragraph D of Section 6 hereof is equal to at least
110% of the fair market value of the stock subject to the incentive stock
option as of the date of grant and unless the term during which such incentive
stock option may be exercised does not exceed five years from the date of the
grant thereof. Options will not be treated as incentive stock options to the
extent that the aggregate fair market value (determined as of the date the
option is granted) of the Common Stock with respect to which options are
exercisable for the first time by an employee during any calendar year (under
all incentive stock option plans of the Corporation and its Subsidiaries)
exceeds $100,000.

IV. BASIS OF GRANT

Options shall be granted to employees either (a) on the basis of awards
earned under the Corporation’s incentive compensation programs for groups of
key employees, as in effect from time to time, or (b) as the Board of Directors
or the Committee may determine from time to time. If options are granted based
on (a) hereof, then performance bonuses and options based thereon shall be
earned based on the employee’s success in meeting predetermined performance
standards during one or more years (the “Performance Period”). Options shall
be granted under (a) hereof, if at all, at the time that the Corporation
determines in its judgment that the employee has met or will meet the
employee’s predetermined performance standards for the Performance Period.

Each Outside Director automatically shall be granted non-qualified
stock options to purchase 5,000 shares on the date of the Outside Director’s
first election or appointment to the Board, subject to vesting as provided in
Paragraph B of Section 6 hereof. Each Outside Director automatically shall be
granted non-qualified stock options to purchase an additional 5,000 shares (the
“Additional Options”) on the day after all stock options previously granted
under this paragraph become 100% vested (other than vesting by reason of death
or disability). All such subsequent grants of stock options shall vest, as to
one-sixtieth, on the date of grant and shall thereafter be subject to vesting
as provided in Paragraph B of Section 6 hereof.

V. NUMBER OF SHARES AND OPTIONS

A. Shares of Stock Subject to the Plan. The number of shares
authorized to be issued pursuant to options granted under the Plan is 3,800,000
shares, subject to adjustment in accordance with the provisions of paragraph G
of Section 6 hereof. Shares subject to options granted under the Plan may be
authorized and unissued shares or shares previously acquired or to be acquired
by the Corporation and held in treasury. Any shares subject to an option which
expires for any reason or is terminated unexercised as to such shares may again
be subject to an option granted under the Plan.

B. Maximum Number of Options. The number of shares which may be
subject to options granted under the Plan in any single calendar year for
awards earned for one-year Performance Periods shall not exceed 200,000 shares,
subject to adjustment in accordance with paragraph G of Section 6 hereof.
There shall be no annual

A-2
30
limitation on options granted with respect to awards earned for Performance
Periods of more than one year. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the maximum
number of shares which may be subject to options granted under the Plan to any
“covered employee” for purposes of Section 162(m) of the Code during the life
of the Plan shall be 100,000 shares subject to adjustment in accordance with
paragraph G of Section 6 hereof.

VI. TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF OPTIONS

A. Option Agreement. Each option granted pursuant to the Plan shall
be evidenced by an agreement (“Option Agreement”) between the Corporation and
the optionee receiving the option. Option Agreements (which need not be
identical) shall state whether the option is an incentive stock option or a
nonqualified stock option, shall designate the number of shares and the
exercise price of the options to which they pertain, shall set forth the
vesting schedule of the options or state that the options are vested
immediately. The Option Agreements shall be in writing, dated as of the date
the option is granted, and shall be executed on behalf of the Corporation by
such officers as the Board or the Committee shall authorize. Option Agreements
generally shall be in such form and contain such additional provisions as the
Board or the Committee, as the case may be, shall prescribe, but in no event
shall they contain provisions inconsistent with the provisions of the Plan.

B. Exercise of Options. Options are exercisable only to the extent
they are vested. Options granted to employees shall vest either immediately or
periodically pursuant to a schedule selected by the Board or the Committee at
the same time the option is granted, except that the maximum vesting period for
nonqualified stock options shall be five (5) years and the maximum vesting
period for incentive stock options shall be seven (7) years. The Option
Agreement shall either state that the options are fully vested upon grant and
immediately exercisable in full or shall set forth the vesting schedule
selected by the Board or the Committee.

One-sixtieth of options granted to each Outside Director shall vest on
the first date of election or appointment of each such Outside Director and an
additional one-sixtieth shall vest on the last day of each month, so long as
such Outside Director remains a member of the Board of Directors of the
Corporation and, if such Outside Director resigns as an Outside Director after
completion of ten (10) or more years of continuous service as an Outside
Director, so long as such individual survives, until such option is vested in
full. Upon termination of an Outside Director as a member of the Board of
Directors by reason of death or disability, all options held by such Outside
Director shall vest fully as of the date of termination.

Optionees may exercise at any time or from time to time all of any
portion of a vested option; provided, however, that options granted to any
director or “officer” of the Corporation or “beneficial owner” of more than ten
percent of any class of equity security of the Corporation, as defined for
purposes of Sections 16(a) and 16(b) of the Act shall not be exercisable for a
period of at least six months from the date of grant.

C. Repurchase Amendment. Options granted to employees may be amended
to advance the date on which the option shall vest. If an option is so
amended, the amendment also may provide that the shares which would not have
been vested under the vesting schedule set forth in the Option Agreement shall
be subject to repurchase by the Corporation for a specified period of time at
the original exercise price if the employment of the optionee is terminated for
any reason prior to expiration of the repurchase period. The amendment shall
be evidenced by a written agreement (the “Repurchase Amendment”) between the
Corporation and the optionee, shall be executed on behalf of the Corporation by
such officers as the Board or the Committee shall authorize, and shall be in
such form and contain such provisions as the Board or the Committee, as the
case may be, shall prescribe.

D. Exercise Price.

1. Incentive Stock Options. The price at which incentive stock
options granted pursuant to the Plan may be exercised shall be determined by
the Committee or the Board, which price shall be at least equal to the fair
market value of the underlying Common Stock at the date at the options are
granted. In the case of incentive stock options granted to a person who owns,
immediately after the grant of such incentive stock option, stock possessing
more than 10% of the total combined voting power of all classes of stock of the
Corporation or of any of its Subsidiaries (as more fully set forth in Section 3
hereof), the purchase price of the Common Stock covered by such incentive stock
option shall not be less than 110% of the fair market value of such stock on
the date of grant.

A-3
31
2. Nonqualified Stock Options. The price at which all
nonqualified stock options granted pursuant to the Plan may be exercised,
except those options granted on the basis of awards earned for one-year
Performance Periods under the Corporation’s incentive compensation programs,
shall be the fair market value of the Common Stock on the date of grant. The
exercise price of nonqualified stock options granted on the basis of awards
earned for one-year Performance Periods under the Corporation’s incentive
compensation programs may be other than the fair market value of the Common
Stock on the date of grant only if the exercise price is determined by a
formula which is based on the fair market value of the Common Stock, as of a
date, or for a period, that is within three months of the date of grant and
which is selected by the Board of Directors or Committee, in its sole
discretion, and determined by the Board of Directors or Committee, in its sole
discretion, to be in the best interests of the Corporation and consistent with
the intent of the incentive compensation program. The exercise price as
determined under any such formula may be below fair market value of the Common
Stock on the date of grant. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the exercise price
of any option granted to a “covered employee” for purposes of Section 162(m) of
the Code shall be the fair market value of the Common Stock on the date of
grant.

3. Fair Market Value. For purposes of the Plan the term “fair
market value” shall be defined as the closing bid price of the Common Stock
quoted over the National Association of Securities Dealers Automated Quotation
System (“NASDAQ”) in the national market on the date of grant of the option or
if there is no trade on such date, the closing bid price on the last preceding
date upon which such Common Stock was traded. In the event that the Common
Stock is not traded over NASDAQ, the term fair market value shall be defined as
the closing bid price of the Common Stock published in the National Daily Stock
Quotation Summary on the date of grant of the option, of if there are no
quotations published on such date, on the most recent date upon which such
Common Stock was quoted. In the event that the Common Stock is listed upon an
established stock exchange or exchanges, such fair market value shall be deemed
to be the highest closing price of the Common Stock on such stock exchange or
exchanges on the date the option is granted, or if no sale of the Common Stock
shall have been made on any exchange on that date, then the next preceding day
on which there was a sale of such stock.

4. Payment. Payment of the exercise price may be (i) in cash,
(ii) by delivery to the Corporation of (x) irrevocable instructions to deliver
to a broker the stock certificates representing the shares for which the option
is being exercised, and (y) irrevocable instructions to the broker to sell such
shares and promptly deliver to the Corporation the portion of the proceeds
equal to the exercise price, or in the sole discretion of the Board or
Committee, (iii) by exchange of Common Stock of the Corporation, or, (iv)
partly in cash and partly by exchange of such Common Stock, provided that for
purposes of (iii) and (iv) the value of such Common Stock shall be the fair
market value on the date of exercise, and further provided that such Common
Stock shall have been held by the optionee for a period of at least six (6)
months prior to the date of exercise.

The Board or the Committee may permit deferred payment of all or
any part of the purchase price of the shares purchased pursuant to the Plan,
provided the par value of the shares must be paid in cash.

E. Suspension or Termination of Options. Subject to earlier termination
as provided below, (i) all nonqualified stock options shall expire, and all
rights granted under nonqualified stock Option Agreements shall become null and
void on the date specified in the Option Agreement, which date shall be no
later than five (5) years after the nonqualified stock options are granted and
(ii) all incentive stock options shall expire, and all rights granted under
incentive stock Option Agreements shall become null and void on the date
specified in the Option Agreement, which date shall be no later than eight (8)
years after the date the incentive stock options are granted.

Upon termination of an employee’s employment with the Corporation or a
Subsidiary for any reason, or upon termination of an Outside Director as a
member of the Board of Directors for any reason other than resignation as an
Outside Director following completion of ten (10) or more years of continuous
service as an Outside Director, death or disability, all options held by such
employee or Outside Director which are not exercisable on the date of such
termination shall expire. To the extent nonqualified stock options are
exercisable on such date, shares subject to nonqualified stock options held by
an employee may be purchased during the “exercise period,” after which the
nonqualified stock options shall expire and all rights granted under the Option
Agreement shall become null and void. The “exercise period” for shares subject
to nonqualified stock options held by an employee, his heirs, legatees or legal
representatives, as the case may be, ends on the earlier of (i) the date on
which the nonqualified stock option expires by its terms, or (ii) (A) except in
the case of death, disability, or resignation as an employee following
completion of ten (10) or more years of continuous service as an employee,
thirty (30) days after the date of the

A-4
32
employee’s termination of employment, or (B) in the case of death, disability,
or resignation as an employee following completion of ten (10) or more year of
continuous service, one (1) year after the date of the employee’s termination
of employment. Upon termination of an Outside Director as a member of the
Board of Directors for the reason of resignation as an Outside Director
following completion of at least ten (10) years of continuous service as an
Outside Director, death or disability, the “exercise period” for shares subject
to nonqualified stock options held by the Outside Director, his heirs,
legatees, or legal representatives, as the case may be, ends on the earlier of
(i) the date on which the nonqualified stock option expires by its terms, or
(ii) the date one (1) year after the date of termination of the Outside
Director’s service as a member of the Board of Directors. In any event, no
nonqualified stock option may be exercised after the date on which the
nonqualified stock option expires by its terms.

To the extent incentive stock options are exercisable on the date of
termination, shares subject to incentive stock options may be purchased by the
employee, his heirs, legatees or legal representatives, as the case may be, on
the earlier of (i) the date on which the incentive stock option expires by its
terms or (ii) (A) except in the case of death or disability, within thirty (30)
days, or (B) in the case of death or disability, within one (1) year after the
date of termination of employment, after which the incentive stock options
shall expire and all rights under the Option Agreements shall become null and
void In any event, no incentive stock option may be exercised after the date
on which the incentive stock option expires by its terms.

If the Director of Human Resources of the Corporation or his or her
designee reasonably believes an optionee other than an Outside Director has
committed an act of misconduct as described in this paragraph, the Director of
Human Resources may suspend the optionee’s rights to exercise any option
pending a determination by the Board of Directors. If the Board of Directors
determines an optionee other than an Outside Director has committed an act of
embezzlement, fraud, dishonesty, nonpayment of any obligation owed to the
Corporation, breach of fiduciary duty or deliberate disregard of Corporation
rules resulting in loss, damage or injury to the Corporation, or if an optionee
makes an unauthorized disclosure of any trade secret or confidential
information, engages in any conduct constituting unfair competition, induces
any customer to breach a contract with an optionee or induces any principal for
whom the Corporation acts as agent to terminate such agency relationship,
neither the optionee nor his or her estate shall be entitled to exercise any
option whatsoever. In making such determination, the Board of Directors shall
act fairly and shall give the optionee an opportunity to appear and present
evidence on his or her behalf at a hearing before a committee of the Board of
Directors. For any optionee who is an “officer” for purposes of Section 16 of
the Act, the determination shall be made by the Committee.

F. Non-Transferability of Options. Options pursuant to the Plan are
not transferable by the optionee otherwise than by will or the laws of descent
and distribution, or pursuant to a qualified domestic relations order as
defined by the Code, Title I of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of
1974, as amended, or the rules thereunder. Except as permitted by the
preceding sentence, no option nor any right granted under an Option Agreement
shall be transferred, assigned, pledged, hypothecated or disposed of in any
other way (whether by operation of law or otherwise), or be subject to
execution, attachment or similar process, and each option shall be exercisable
during the optionee’s lifetime only by the optionee. Upon any attempt to
transfer, assign, pledge, hypothecate or otherwise dispose of such options or
of such other rights contrary to the provisions hereof, or to subject such
options or such other rights to execution, attachment or similar process, such
options and such other rights shall immediately terminate and become null and
void.

G. Adjustment Provisions. Except as otherwise provided in this
paragraph G, in the event of changes in the Common Stock by reason of any stock
split, combination of shares, stock dividend, reclassification, merger,
consolidation, reorganization, recapitalization or similar adjustment, or by
reason of the dissolution or liquidation of the Corporation, appropriate
adjustments may be made in (i) the aggregate number of or class of shares
available under the Plan, and (ii) the number, class and exercise price of
shares remaining subject to all outstanding options. Whether any adjustment or
modification is to be made as a result of the occurrence of any of the events
specified in this section, and the extent thereof, shall be determined by the
Board, whose determination shall be binding and conclusive. Notwithstanding
the previous sentence, in the event of a stock split, stock dividend or other
event that is functionally equivalent to a stock split or stock dividend, (i)
the number of shares subject to then-outstanding options will be adjusted
so that upon exercise of the option, the holder of each option will be entitled
to receive the number of shares or other securities which the holder would have
been entitled to receive after the event had the option been exercised
immediately before the earlier of the date of the consummation of the event or
the record date of the event (the “event date”), (ii) the price of each share
subject to then-outstanding options will be adjusted

A-5
33
proportionately so that the aggregate purchase price for all then-outstanding
options will be the same immediately after the event date as before the event
date, (iii) an appropriate and proportionate adjustment will be made as of the
event date in the maximum number of shares that may be issued pursuant to
options granted under the Plan, (iv) any adjustment with respect to
then-outstanding incentive stock options will be made in a transaction that does
not constitute a modification under Section 424(h)(3) of the Code, and (v) any
option to purchase fractional shares resulting from an adjustment will be
eliminated. Existence of the Plan or of Option Agreements pursuant to the Plan
shall in no way impair the right of the Corporation or its stockholders to make
or effect any adjustments, recapitalizations, reorganizations or other changes
in the Corporation’s capital structure or its business, or any merger,
consolidation, dissolution or liquidation of the Corporation, or any issue of
bonds, debentures, preferred or prior preference stock ahead of or affecting the
Common Stock of the Corporation, or any grant of options on its stock not
pursuant to the Plan.

VII. RIGHTS AS A SHAREHOLDER

Optionees shall not have any of the rights and privileges of
shareholders of the Corporation in respect of any of the shares subject to any
option granted pursuant to the Plan unless and until a certificate, if any,
representing such shares shall have been issued and delivered.

VIII. WITHHOLDING

To the extent required by applicable federal, state, local or foreign
law, an optionee shall make arrangements satisfactory to the Corporation for
the satisfaction of any withholding tax obligations that arise by reason of an
option exercise or the disposition of shares acquired upon exercise of an
incentive stock option. The Corporation shall not be required to issue shares
until such obligations are satisfied. The Committee may permit these
obligations to be satisfied by having the Corporation withhold a portion of the
shares of Common Stock that otherwise would be issued upon exercise of the
option, or to the extent permitted, by permitting the optionee to tender shares
owned by the optionee.

IX. RECEIPT OF PROSPECTUS

Upon the execution of an Option Agreement, each optionee receiving
options pursuant to the Plan shall be given a Prospectus, as filed by the
Corporation under the Securities Act of 1933, including any exhibits thereto,
describing the Plan. Each Option Agreement shall contain an acknowledgment by
the optionee that the requirements of this section have been met.

X. SUCCESSORS

The provisions of the Plan shall be binding upon, and inure to the
benefit of, all successors of any optionee, including, without limitation, his
estate and the executors, administrators or trustees thereof, his heirs and
legatees, and any receiver, trustee in bankruptcy or representative of
creditors of such optionee.

XI. TERMINATION AND AMENDMENT OF THE PLAN

Subject to obtaining shareholder approval of this Amended Stock Option
Plan F at the annual meeting of the shareholders on May 9, 1997, the Plan shall
remain in effect until January 1, 2006, unless sooner terminated as hereinafter
provided. The Board shall have complete power and authority at any time to
terminate the Plan or to make such modification or amendment thereof as it
deems advisable and may from time to time suspend, discontinue or abandon the
Plan, provided that no such action by the Board shall adversely affect any
right or obligation with respect to any grant theretofore made, and, further
provided that without approval by vote of the shareholders, the Board shall not
adopt any amendment that would (i) materially modify the requirements as to the
exercise price of stock options, (ii) increase the number of shares which may
be issued under the Plan (except as provided in paragraph G of Section 6
hereof), (iii) materially modify the requirements as to eligibility for
participation in the Plan, or (iv) materially modify the terms of the Plan as
to “covered employees” within the meaning of Section 162(m) of the Code.

A-6
34
XII. INDEMNIFICATION OF COMMITTEE

In addition to such other rights of indemnification as they may have as
directors or as members of the Committee, the members of the Committee shall be
indemnified by the Corporation against the reasonable expenses, including
attorneys’ fees actually and necessarily incurred in connection with the
defense of any action, suit or proceeding, or in connection with any appeal
therein, to which they or any of them may be a party by reason of any action
taken or failure to act under or in connection with the Plan, Option Agreements
or any option granted hereunder, and against all amounts paid by them in
settlement thereof (provided such settlement is approved by legal counsel
selected by the Corporation) or paid by them in satisfaction of a judgment in
any such action, suit or proceeding, except in relation to matters as to which
it shall be adjudged in such action, suit or proceeding that such Committee
member is liable for negligence or misconduct in the performance of his duties;
provided that within sixty (60) days after institution of any such action, suit
or proceeding a Committee member shall in writing offer the Corporation the
opportunity, at its own expense, to defend the same.

XIII. MERGER OF THE CORPORATION

Unless the options issued pursuant to this Plan are assumed in a
transaction to which Section 424(a) of the Code applies, if the Corporation
shall (i) merge or consolidate with another corporation under circumstances
where the Corporation is not the surviving corporation, (ii) sell all, or
substantially all of its assets, or (iii) liquidate or dissolve, then each
option shall terminate on the date and immediately prior to the time such
merger, consolidation, sale, liquidation or dissolution becomes effective or is
consummated, provided that the holder of the option shall have the right
immediately prior to the effectiveness or consummation of such merger,
consolidation, sale, liquidation or dissolution, to exercise any or all of the
vested portion of the option, unless such option has otherwise expired or been
terminated pursuant to its terms or the terms hereof. In the event of such
merger, consolidation, sale, liquidation or dissolution, any portion of an
outstanding option which would have vested within one year after the date on
which such merger, consolidation, sale, liquidation or dissolution becomes
effective or is consummated shall vest immediately prior to the effectiveness
or consummation of such merger, consolidation, sale, liquidation or dissolution
and shall be part of the vested portion of the option which the holder of the
option may exercise.

XIV. APPROVAL OF PLAN; EFFECTIVE DATE

The plan was adopted by the Board of Directors on April 3, 1996, and
was approved by the shareholders on May 10, 1996. The Plan was amended by the
Board of Directors on February 21, 1997, subject to shareholder approval of the
amendments at the annual meeting of shareholders on May 9, 1997.

A-7
35
APPENDIX 1

AMERICAN MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS, INCORPORATED

1996 FINANCIAL REPORT

CONTENTS
– ——————————————————————————–



Business of AMS 1

Financial Statements and Notes 3

Report of Independent Accountants 19

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations 20

Assumptions Underlying Certain Forward-Looking
Statements and Factors That May Affect Future Results 25

Five-Year Financial Summary 26

Five-Year Revenues by Target Market 27

Selected Quarterly Financial Data and Information
on AMS Stock 28

Other Information 29

36

BUSINESS OF AMS

OVERVIEW

With 1996 revenues of $812 million, the business of American Management
Systems, Incorporated and its wholly-owned subsidiaries (“AMS” or the
“Company”) is to partner with clients to achieve breakthrough performance
through the intelligent use of information technology. AMS provides a full
range of consulting services from strategic business analysis to the full
implementation of solutions that provide genuine results, on time and within
budget. AMS measures success based on the results and business benefits
achieved by its clients.

AMS is a trusted business partner for many of the largest and most
respected organizations in the markets in which it specializes. Each year,
approximately 85-90% of the Company’s business comes from clients it worked
with in previous years.

Organizations in AMS’s target markets — telecommunications firms;
financial services institutions; state and local governments and education
organizations; federal government agencies; and other corporate clients — have
a crucial need to exploit the potential benefits of information and systems
integration technology. The Company helps clients fulfill this need by
continuing to build a professional staff which is composed of experts in the
necessary technical and functional disciplines; managers who can lead large,
complex systems integration projects; and business and computer analysts who
can devise creative solutions to complex problems.

Another significant component of AMS’s business is the development of
proprietary software products, either with its own funds or on a cost-shared
basis with other organizations. These products are principally licensed as
elements of custom tailored systems and, to a lesser extent, as stand-alone
applications. The Company expensed $26.0 million in 1996, $19.4 million in
1995, and $20.4 million in 1994 for research and development associated with
proprietary software. As a percentage of services and products (S&P) revenues,
license and maintenance fee revenues were less than 15% during each of the last
three years.

In order to serve clients outside of the United States, AMS has expanded
internationally by establishing thirteen subsidiaries or branches. Exhibit 21
of this Form 10-K provides a complete listing of all AMS subsidiaries (and
branches), showing name, year organized (acquired), and place of incorporation.
Services and products revenues attributable to non-US operations of AMS were
approximately $267.8 million in 1996, $170.0 million in 1995, and $92.1 million
in 1994. Additional information on revenues, operating profits, and assets
attributable to AMS’s geographic areas of operation is provided in Note 10 of
the consolidated financial statements appearing elsewhere in this financial
report.

Founded in 1970, AMS services clients worldwide. AMS’s approximately 6,800
full-time employees serve clients from corporate headquarters in Fairfax,
Virginia and from 53 offices worldwide.

1

37

TELECOMMUNICATIONS FIRMS

AMS markets systems consulting and integration services for order
processing, customer care, billing, accounts receivable, and collections, both
for local exchange and interexchange carriers and for cellular telephone
companies. Most of the Company’s work involves developing and implementing
customized capabilities using AMS’s application software products as a
foundation.

FINANCIAL SERVICES INSTITUTIONS

AMS provides information technology consulting and systems integration
services to money center banks, major regional banks, insurance companies, and
other large financial services firms. The Company specializes in corporate and
international banking, consumer credit management, global custody and
securities control systems, and bank management information systems.

STATE AND LOCAL GOVERNMENTS AND EDUCATION

AMS markets systems consulting and integration services, and application
software products, to state, county, and municipal governments for financial
management, revenue management, human resources, social services, and public
safety functions. The Company also markets services and application software
products to universities and colleges.

FEDERAL GOVERNMENT AGENCIES

The Company’s clients include civilian and defense agencies and aerospace
companies. Assignments require knowledge of agency programs and management
practices as well as expertise in computer systems integration. AMS’s work for
defense agencies often involves specialized expertise in engineering and
logistics.

OTHER CORPORATE CLIENTS

The Company also solves information systems problems for the largest firms
in other industries, including health care organizations and firms in the gas
and electric utilities industry. AMS has systems integration and operations
contracts with several large organizations and intends to pursue more of these
contracts. AMS provides technical training and technical consulting services in
software technology for large scale business systems.

2

38

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND NOTES

American Management Systems, Inc.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS



Year Ended December 31
(In millions except per share data) 1996 1995 1994
– —————————————————————————————————————————–


REVENUES
Services and Products $732.6 $561.5 $408.8
Reimbursed Expenses 79.6 70.9 51.1
—— —— ——
812.2 632.4 459.9

EXPENSES
Client Project Expenses 525.9 348.6 246.9
Other Operating Expenses 210.4 192.3 140.1
Corporate Expenses 48.3 40.8 32.6
—— —— ——
784.6 581.7 419.6

INCOME FROM OPERATIONS 27.6 50.7 40.3

OTHER (INCOME) EXPENSE
Interest Expense 3.2 2.3 1.4
Other Income (1.8) (1.4) (0.6)
—— —— ——
1.4 0.9 0.8

INCOME BEFORE INCOME TAXES 26.2 49.8 39.5

INCOME TAXES 10.7 20.6 16.1

NET INCOME 15.5 29.2 23.4

DIVIDENDS AND ACCRETION ON SERIES B
PREFERRED STOCK – – 0.3
—— —— ——
NET INCOME TO COMMON STOCKHOLDERS $ 15.5 $ 29.2 $ 23.1
====== ====== ======
WEIGHTED AVERAGE SHARES AND EQUIVALENTS 41.9 40.7 38.7
====== ====== ======
NET INCOME PER COMMON SHARE $ 0.37 $ 0.72 $ 0.60
====== ====== ======

– —————-
See Accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

3

39

American Management Systems, Inc.

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS



December 31 (In millions except per share data) 1996 1995
– —————————————————————————————————————————
ASSETS
– —————————————————————————————————————————


CURRENT ASSETS
Cash and Cash Equivalents $ 62.8 $ 35.8
Accounts and Notes Receivable 247.7 206.1
Prepaid Expenses and Other Current Assets 13.3 8.9
—— ——
323.8 250.8

FIXED ASSETS
Equipment 62.0 47.4
Furniture and Fixtures 18.4 14.2
Leasehold Improvements 10.7 11.4
—— ——
91.1 73.0
Accumulated Depreciation and Amortization (43.1) (35.9)
—— ——
48.0 37.1

OTHER ASSETS
Purchased and Developed Computer Software (Net of
Accumulated Amortization of $50,500,000 and
$47,700,000) 40.2 33.0
Intangibles (Net of Accumulated Amortization of
$2,600,000 and $2,100,000) 6.3 6.8
Other Assets (Net of Accumulated Amortization of
$15,700,000 and $4,900,000) 5.9 9.8
—— ——
52.4 49.6
—— ——

TOTAL ASSETS $424.2 $337.5
====== ======

– —————-
See Accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

4

40

American Management Systems, Inc.

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS



December 31 (In millions except per share data) 1996 1995
– —————————————————————————————————————————-

LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
– —————————————————————————————————————————


CURRENT LIABILITIES
Notes Payable and Capitalized Lease Obligations $ 53.5 $ 23.1
Accounts Payable 19.6 8.6
Accrued Incentive Compensation 36.1 28.3
Other Accrued Compensation and Related Items 32.3 25.3
Deferred Revenues 20.6 26.3
Other Accrued Liabilities 2.7 2.3
Provision for Contract Losses 18.5 –
Income Taxes Payable 7.8 2.3
——- ——-
191.1 116.2
Deferred Income Taxes 7.7 19.0
——- ——-
198.8 135.2

NONCURRENT LIABILITIES
Notes Payable and Capitalized Lease Obligations 13.7 20.4
Other Accrued Liabilities 1.4 0.7
Deferred Income Taxes 7.2 5.7
——- ——-
22.3 26.8
——- ——-

TOTAL LIABILITIES 221.1 162.0

STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Preferred Stock ($0.10 Par Value; 4,000,000 Shares
Authorized, None Issued or Outstanding)
Common Stock ($0.01 Par Value; 100,000,000 Shares
Authorized, 49,598,673 and 48,867,891 Issued and
40,939,209 and 40,040,454 Outstanding) 0.5 0.5
Capital in Excess of Par Value 75.0 65.4
Retained Earnings 157.3 141.8
Currency Translation Adjustment (1.1) (0.7)
Common Stock in Treasury, at Cost (8,659,464 and
8,827,437 Shares) (28.6) (31.5)
——- ——-
203.1 175.5
——- ——-

TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY $ 424.2 $ 337.5
======= =======

– —————-
See Accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

5
41

American Management Systems, Inc.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS



Year Ended December 31 (In millions) 1996 1995 1994
– —————————————————————————————————————————


CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
Net Income $ 15.5 $ 29.2 $ 23.4
Adjustments to Reconcile Net Income to Net Cash
Provided by Operating Activities:
Depreciation and Amortization 39.3 30.2 20.7
Deferred Income Taxes (9.8) 6.0 5.2
Provision for Doubtful Accounts 15.2 1.6 1.5
Provision for Contract Losses 18.5 – –
Changes in Assets and Liabilities:
Increase in Trade Receivables (56.8) (66.5) (41.0)
(Increase) Decrease in Prepaid Expenses and Other
Current Assets (4.3) (2.3) 1.9
Increase in Other Assets (7.3) (9.1) (1.9)
Increase in Accrued Incentive Compensation 11.2 14.1 5.2
Increase in Accounts Payable and Other Accrued
Compensation and Liabilities 19.0 8.7 5.7
(Decrease) Increase in Deferred Revenues (5.7) 0.6 11.0
Increase in Income Taxes Payable 5.5 0.5 1.6
——- ——- ——
Net Cash Provided by Operating Activities 40.3 13.0 33.3
——- ——- ——

CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
Purchase of Fixed Assets (27.5) (22.5) (17.0)
Purchase of Computer Software (5.6) (2.3) (1.5)
Investment in Software Products (13.8) (13.7) (9.9)
Other Investments and Intangibles 0.5 0.4 (0.1)
Proceeds from Sale of Fixed Assets and Computer Software 0.7 0.5 0.2
——- ——- ——
Net Cash Used in Investing Activities (45.7) (37.6) (28.3)
——- ——- ——

CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
Borrowings 30.4 26.5 12.8
Payments on Borrowings (6.7) (5.4) (4.5)
Proceeds and Related Tax Benefits from Common Stock
Options Exercised 9.5 5.3 5.5
Payments to Acquire Treasury Stock (0.5) (0.8) –
Dividends Paid on Preferred Stock – – (0.3)
——- ——- ——
Net Cash Provided by Financing Activities 32.7 25.6 13.5
——- ——- ——
(Decrease) Increase in Currency Translation Adjustment (0.3) 0.6 0.1
——- ——- ——
NET INCREASE IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS 27.0 1.6 18.6

CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS AT BEGINNING OF YEAR 35.8 34.2 15.6
——- ——- ——
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS AT END OF YEAR $ 62.8 $ 35.8 $ 34.2
======= ======= ======

NON-CASH OPERATING AND FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
Treasury Stock Utilized to Satisfy Accrued
Incentive Compensation Liability $ 3.4 $ 2.9 $ 0.6
Conversion of Preferred Stock to Common Stock – – 8.5

– —————-
See Accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

6

42

American Management Systems, Inc.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
(In millions)



Common
Stock Capital in Currency Total
(Par Value Excess of Translation Retained Treasury Stockholders’
$0.01) Par Value Adjustment Earnings Stock Equity
– ——————————————————————————————————————————-


Balance, December 31, 1993 $0.5 $44.7 $(1.5) $ 89.5 $(34.2) $ 99.0

Common Stock Options Exercised – 5.4 5.4
Preferred Stock Converted – 8.5 8.5
Tax Benefit Related to Exercise of
Common Stock Options 1.6 1.6
Currency Translation Adjustment 0.1 0.1
Common Stock Repurchased – –
Restricted Stock Awarded 0.6 0.6
1994 Net Income 23.4 23.4
Dividends and Accretion on Series B
Preferred Stock (0.3) (0.3)
— —– —– —— —— ——
Balance, December 31, 1994 0.5 60.2 (1.4) 112.6 (33.6) 138.3

Common Stock Options Exercised – 3.3 3.3
Tax Benefit Related to Exercise of
Common Stock Options 1.9 1.9
Currency Translation Adjustment 0.7 0.7
Common Stock Repurchased (0.8) (0.8)
Restricted Stock Awarded 2.9 2.9
1995 Net Income 29.2 29.2
— —– —– —— —— ——
Balance, December 31, 1995 0.5 65.4 (0.7) 141.8 (31.5) 175.5

Common Stock Options Exercised – 5.1 5.1
Tax Benefit Related to Exercise of
Common Stock Options 4.5 4.5
Currency Translation Adjustment (0.4) (0.4)
Common Stock Repurchased (0.5) (0.5)
Restricted Stock Awarded 3.4 3.4
1996 Net Income 15.5 15.5

—- —– —– —— —— ——
Balance at December 31, 1996 $0.5 $75.0 $(1.1) $157.3 $(28.6) $203.1
==== ===== ===== ====== ====== ======

– —————-
See Accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

7

43

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

NOTE 1 — NATURE OF OPERATIONS AND SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

The business of American Management Systems, Incorporated and its
wholly-owned subsidiaries (“AMS” or the “Company”) is to partner with clients
to achieve breakthrough performance through the intelligent use of information
technology. AMS provides a full range of consulting services from strategic
business analysis to the full implementation of systems solutions. The
Company’s primary target markets include telecommunications firms, financial
services institutions, state and local governments and education, federal
government agencies and other corporate clients. AMS services clients worldwide
through its offices in North America and Europe.

A. Revenue Recognition

Revenues on fixed-price contracts are recorded using the percentage of
completion method based on the relationship of costs incurred to the estimated
total costs of the project. Revenues on cost reimbursable contracts and time
and material contracts are recorded as labor and other expenses are incurred.

Revenues from licenses of “off-the-shelf” software products, where the
Company has insignificant remaining obligations, are recorded at the time of
delivery, less a proportionate amount deferred to cover the costs required to
complete the performance of the contract which is later recognized on a
percentage of completion basis. In contracts where the Company has significant
obligations to customize the software, all revenues are recognized on a
percentage of completion basis. Revenues from software maintenance contracts
are recognized ratably over the maintenance period.

On benefits-funded contracts (contracts whereby the amounts due the
Company are earned based on actual benefits derived by the client), the Company
defers recognition of revenues until that point at which management can
predict, with reasonable certainty, that the benefit stream will generate
amounts sufficient to fund the contract. From that point forward revenues are
recognized on a percentage of completion basis.

When adjustments in contract value or estimated costs are determined, any
changes from prior estimates are reflected in earnings in the current period.
Any anticipated losses on contracts in progress are charged to earnings when
identified. The costs associated with cost-plus government contracts are
subject to audit by the U.S. Government. In the opinion of management, no
significant adjustments or disallowances of costs are anticipated beyond those
provided for in the financial statements.

B. Software Development Costs

The Company develops proprietary software products using its own funds, or
on a cost-shared basis with other organizations, and records such activities as
research and development. These software products are then licensed to
customers, either as stand-alone applications, or as elements of custom-built
systems.

The Company accounts for software development costs in accordance with
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 86 — “Accounting for the Costs
of Computer Software to be Sold, Leased, or Otherwise Marketed”. For projects
fully funded by the Company, significant development costs incurred beyond the
point of demonstrated technological feasibility are capitalized and, after the
product is available for general release to customers, such costs are amortized
on a straight-line basis

8

44

over a three-year period or other such shorter period as might be required. The
Company recorded $9.3 million of amortization in 1996, $9.5 million of
amortization in 1995, and $8.4 million of amortization in 1994. Unamortized
costs were $32.7 million and $28.2 million at December 31, 1996 and 1995,
respectively. The Company evaluates the net realizable value of capitalized
software using the estimated, undiscounted, net-cash flows of the underlying
products.

Including the above mentioned amortization expense, the Company expensed
$26.0 million in 1996, $19.4 million in 1995, and $20.4 million in 1994 for
research and development.

Purchased software licenses will continue to be accounted for as set forth
in Note 1.C.

C. Fixed Assets, Purchased Computer Software Licenses and Intangibles

Fixed assets and purchased computer software licenses are recorded at
cost. Furniture, fixtures, and equipment are depreciated over estimated useful
lives ranging from 3 to 10 years. Leasehold improvements are amortized ratably
over the lesser of the applicable lease term or the useful life of the
improvement. For financial statement purposes, depreciation is computed using
the straight-line method. Purchased software licenses are amortized over two to
five years using the straight-line method. Intangibles are generally amortized
over 5 to 15 years.

D. Income Taxes

Deferred tax liabilities and assets are determined based on the difference
between the financial statement and tax bases of assets and liabilities, using
enacted tax rates for the year in which the differences are expected to
reverse.

Deferred income taxes are provided for timing differences in recognizing
certain income, expense, and credit items for financial reporting purposes and
tax reporting purposes. Such deferred income taxes primarily relate to the
methods of accounting for revenue, capitalized software development costs,
restricted stock, and the timing of deductibility of certain reserves and
accruals for income tax purposes. A valuation allowance is recorded if it is
“more likely than not” that some portion or all of a deferred tax asset will
not be realized.

E. Net Income per Common Share

Net income per common share has been computed using the treasury stock
method based on the weighted average number of common shares and equivalent
common shares outstanding.

F. Cash and Cash Equivalents

The Company considers all highly liquid investments purchased with an
original maturity of three months or less to be cash equivalents. The carrying
amount approximates fair value because of the short maturity of these
instruments.

G. Currency Translation

For operations outside the United States that prepare financial statements
in currencies other than the U.S. dollar, the Company translates income
statement amounts at the average monthly exchange rates throughout the year.
The Company translates assets and liabilities at year-end exchange rates. The
resulting translation adjustments are shown as a separate component of
Stockholders’ Equity.

9

45

H. Principles of Consolidation

The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of American
Management Systems, Incorporated and its wholly-owned subsidiaries. All
significant intercompany transactions have been eliminated.

I. Use of Estimates

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally
accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and
assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the financial statements and
accompanying notes. Future actual results could be different due to these
estimates. Significant estimates inherent in the preparation of the
accompanying consolidated financial statements include: management’s forecasts
of contract costs and progress towards completion which are used to determine
revenue recognition under the percentage-of-completion method, management’s
estimates of allowances for doubtful accounts, and management’s estimates of
the net realizable value of purchased and developed computer software and
intangible assets.

NOTE 2 — SIGNIFICANT CUSTOMERS

Total revenues from the U.S. Government, comprising 90 clients in 1996, 72
clients in 1995, and 69 clients in 1994, were approximately $113.0 million in
1996, $97.1 million in 1995, and $88.5 million in 1994. No other customer
accounted for 10% or more of total revenues in 1996, 1995, or 1994.

NOTE 3 — ACCOUNTS AND NOTES RECEIVABLE



December 31 (In millions) 1996 1995
– ——————————————————————————————————-


Trade Accounts Receivable
Amounts Billed $205.7 $153.6
Amounts Not Billed 48.2 50.3
Contract Retention 11.7 5.7
—— ——
Total 265.6 209.6

Other Receivables 1.0 1.4
Allowance for Doubtful Accounts (18.9) (4.9)
—— ——
Total $247.7 $206.1
====== ======

The Company enters into large, long-term contracts and, as a result,
periodically maintains individually significant receivable balances with
certain major clients. At December 31, 1996, the five largest individual
receivable balances totaled approximately $73 million. No other receivable
exceeded $6 million. The Company expects to receive all funds due from these
clients.

10

46

Credit risk with respect to the Company’s receivables is low due to the
credit worthiness of it’s clients and the diversification of it’s client base
across different industries and geographies. In addition, the Company is
further diversified in that it enters into a range of different types of
contracts, such as fixed price, cost plus, time and material, and benefits
funded contracts. The Company may also, from time to time, work as a
subcontractor on particular contracts. The Company performs ongoing evaluations
of contract performance as well as an evaluation of the client’s financial
condition.

Approximately 12% of the December 31, 1996 total accounts receivable
balance relates to work performed by the Company under subcontractor agreements
between the Company and a prime contractor in the child support enforcement
business. These amounts span four different contracts which the prime
contractor has with state/local government clients in three states. Accounts
receivable on one of these contracts represents 7% of the Company’s total
accounts receivable balance. However, because of the large balance on this
contract and the Company’s inability to obtain payment from the prime
contractor in advance of the prime contractor’s receipt of funding from it’s
client there is more than the usual risk associated with this contract. The
Company expects to receive all funds due under these contracts and has received
some payments in recent months. Additionally, 1.5% of the Company’s total
accounts receivable balance relates to a contract with a foreign government
which has been experiencing cash flow difficulties.

NOTE 4 — NOTES PAYABLE AND CAPITALIZED LEASE OBLIGATIONS

On December 24, 1996, the Company entered into a syndicated $100 million
Multi-Currency Revolving Credit ($80 million) and Term Loan ($20 million)
Agreement (the “Agreement”) with Wachovia Bank, NationsBank and Commerzbank.
This Agreement replaced the two revolving credit agreements (the NationsBank
Agreement and the Wachovia Agreement), totaling $70 million, that the Company
had immediately preceding the execution of the new credit facility, although
outstanding borrowings under the NationsBank Agreement continued in force until
they matured in January 1997.

At December 31, 1996, the Company had $46.8 million outstanding under
revolving credit facilities, approximately $21.3 million of which was
outstanding under the NationsBank Agreement. Additionally, on January 6, 1997,
the Term Loan of $20 million was funded (this $20 million is not included,
either in cash or in Notes Payable, in the December 31, 1996 Balance Sheet).
The Term Loan bears an interest rate of 6.938%, with monthly interest payments
on the unpaid principal balance and quarterly principal payments commencing in
April 1999.

The Company and any of its existing subsidiaries can borrow funds under
the Revolving Credit facility in the borrower’s local currency subject to
certain minimum amounts per borrowing. Interest on such borrowings will range
from LIBOR plus 15 basis points to LIBOR plus 30 basis points depending on the
ratio of total debt to earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and
amortization. The Company must also pay a facility fee ranging from 7.5 basis
points to 15 basis points of the total facility, based on the same performance
measure. Based on such measures at December 31, 1996, interest payments will be
based on LIBOR plus 15 basis points and the facility fee will be 7.5 basis
points. Additionally, the maximum amount which may be borrowed under the
revolving credit portion of the Agreement will be lowered by any letters of
credit which are outstanding at any time. At December 31, 1996, outstanding
letters of credit totaled $1 million, which expired on January 31, 1997.

The Agreement contains certain covenants with which the Company must
comply. These include: (i) maintaining a total debt to total capitalization
ratio of not greater than 0.5 to 1.0, (ii) maintaining a fixed charge coverage
ratio of not less than 2.5 to 1.0, (iii) restrictions on using net worth to
acquire other companies or transferring assets to a subsidiary, and (iv)
restrictions on declaring or paying cash dividends. At December 31, 1996, the
Company was in compliance with all covenants under the Agreement.

11

47

The aggregate weighted average borrowings under all revolving credit
agreements was approximately $29.2 million in 1996, and $15.6 million in 1995,
at daily weighted average interest rates of approximately 5.2% in 1996 and 5.9%
in 1995. The maximum borrowed under all agreements was $49.2 million in 1996
and $23.5 million in 1995.

The following schedule summarizes the total outstanding notes and
capitalized lease obligations. Differences between the face value and the fair
value are considered immaterial.



December 31 (In millions) 1996 1995
– ———————————————————————————————————-

Revolving Line-of-Credit at December 31, $46.8 $16.3

Unsecured Notes With Interest at 5.25% – 6.92%
Principal and Interest Payable Monthly Through
August 2001 20.4 27.2

—– —–

Total Notes Payable and Capitalized Lease Obligations $67.2 $43.5
===== =====

Principal amounts are repayable as shown below:
1997 $53.5 $23.1
1998 5.7 6.7
1999 2.3 5.7
2000 2.2 2.3
2001 and Beyond 3.5 5.7
—– —–

67.2 43.5

Less Current Portion 53.5 23.1
—– —–

Long-Term Portion $13.7 $20.4
===== =====

Interest paid by the Company totaled $3.2 million in 1996, $2.3 million in
1995, and $1.4 million in 1994.

12

48

NOTE 5 — EQUITY SECURITIES

At December 31, 1996, the Company had a stock option plan, 1992 Amended
and Restated Stock Option Plan E, as amended (the “1992 Plan E”), under which
the Company was authorized to issue up to 3,375,000 shares of common stock as
incentive stock options (“ISOs”) or nonqualified stock options (“NSOs”). The
1992 Plan E, which was approved by the shareholders in May 1992, replaced Stock
Option Plan E (“Plan E”). On April 11, 1996, the shareholders approved a new
stock option plan for the Company, Stock Option Plan F (“Plan F”) under which
an additional 3,800,000 shares of common stock may be issued as ISOs or NSOs.

Under all three plans, the exercise price of an ISO granted is not less
than the fair market value of the common stock on the date of grant and for
NSOs, the exercise price is either the fair market value of the common stock on
the date of the grant or, when granted in connection with one-year performance
periods under the Company’s incentive compensation program, the exercise price
may be determined by a formula selected by the Board or appropriate Board
committee that is based on the fair market value of the common stock as of a
date, or for a period, that is within three months of the date of grant. In
cases where the average market value exceeds the exercise price, the
differential is recorded as compensation expense. Under all three plans,
options expire up to eight years from the date of grant. Options granted are
exercisable immediately, in monthly installments, or at a future date, as
determined by the appropriate Board committee or as otherwise specified in the
plan.

At December 31, 1996, there were 85,064 shares available for the grant of
future options under the 1992 Plan E and 3,800,000 shares available under Plan
F. No options remain available for grant under any previous stock option plan.
The number of option shares outstanding and exercisable at December 31, 1996,
under Plan E and 1992 Plan E combined was 2,230,944 for which the aggregate
exercise price was $23,894,717. No option shares had been issued under Plan F
at December 31, 1996.

The Company has chosen to continue to account for stock-based compensation
using the method prescribed in APB Opinion No. 25, “Accounting for Stock Issued
to Employees.” In 1996, the Company adopted Statement of Financial Accounting
Standards No. 123, “Accounting for Stock Based Compensation” (SFAS No. 123),
for disclosure purposes only.

The Company has eight-year and five-year options. For disclosure purposes,
the fair value of each stock option grant is estimated on the date of grant
using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model. The following weighted-average
assumptions were used for the eight-year stock options granted in 1996 and
1995, respectively: expected volatility of 38.01% and 39.25%; risk-free
interest rate of 6.48% and 6.28%; expected average life of five years; and zero
dividend yield. The weighted-average fair value of the eight-year stock options
granted in 1996 and 1995 was $12.36 and $6.47, respectively. The following
weighted-average assumptions were used for the five-year stock options granted
in 1996 and 1995, respectively: expected average life of 36.35% and 38.53%;
risk-free interest rate of 5.58% and 7.26%; expected average life of four
years; and zero dividend yield. The weighted-average fair value of the
five-year stock options granted in 1996 and 1995 was $8.06 and $5.61,
respectively.

Under the above models, the total value of the eight-year stock options
granted in 1996 and 1995 was $1.8 million and $1.6 million, respectively, which
would be amortized on a graded vesting schedule on a pro-forma basis over a
seven-year vesting period. The total value of the five-year stock options
granted in 1996 and 1995 was $5.0 million and $2.8 million, respectively, which
would be amortized ratably on a pro-forma basis over a five-year vesting period
(which varies between four months and five years). If the Company determined
compensation cost for these plans in accordance with SFAS No. 123, the
Company’s pro-forma net income and earnings per share would have been $13.1
million and $0.31 in 1996 and $28.0 million and $0.69 in 1995. The SFAS No. 123
method of accounting does not apply to options granted prior to January 1,
1995, and accordingly, the resulting pro-forma compensation cost may not be
representative of that to be expected in future years.

13

49

Additional information with respect to stock options awarded pursuant to
such plans is summarized in the following schedule.



Number of
Option Exercise Price
Shares per Share

– ——————————————————————————————————————-

For the Year Ended December 31, 1994:
Options Granted 726,303 $ 8.45 – $11.50
Options Canceled 48,971 3.60 – 10.11
Options Exercised 1,071,819 1.91 – 10.11
Balance Outstanding at December 31, 1994: 3,242,551 3.45 – 11.50

For the Year Ended December 31, 1995:
Options Granted 737,752 11.53 – 19.33
Options Canceled 9,486 3.59 – 11.53
Options Exercised 566,235 3.44 – 14.83
Balance Outstanding at December 31, 1995 3,404,582 3.59 – 19.33

For the Year Ended December 31, 1996:
Options Granted 769,451 19.08 – 35.63
Options Canceled 26,495 5.24 – 24.00
Options Exercised 730,782 5.11 – 19.08
Balance Outstanding at December 31, 1996 3,416,756 3.59 – 35.63

At its February 1995 meeting, the Board authorized the Company to expend
up to $10 million to repurchase additional shares of its common stock, from
time to time, for its stock-based benefit plans or for other corporate
purposes. In 1996 and 1995, the Company repurchased 24,600 and 60,000 shares of
its common stock, respectively, totaling $1.3 million. In 1994, the Company did
not repurchase, other than fractional shares from the October stock split, any
of its common stock.

14

50

NOTE 6 — INCOME TAXES



Year Ended December 31 (In millions) 1996 1995 1994
– ——————————————————————————————————————-


Income before income taxes for the year ended
December 31 was derived in the following jurisdictions:
Domestic $ 8.7 $ 42.6 $ 36.8
Foreign 17.5 7.2 2.7
——- ——- ——-

$ 26.2 $ 49.8 $ 39.5
======= ======= =======

The provision for income taxes is comprised of the following:
Current:
Federal $ 10.4 $ 9.4 $ 7.8
State 1.4 1.8 2.1
Foreign 8.7 3.4 1.0
Deferred:
Federal (4.3) 5.4 5.1
State (0.5) 0.6 0.2
Foreign (5.0) – (0.1)
——- ——- ——-

Total Provision $ 10.7 $ 20.6 $ 16.1
======= ======= =======

Taxexpenses were different from the amounts computed
by applying the statutory federal income tax rate to
income before income taxes.
The differences were as follows:
Federal Tax Provision Based on Statutory Rates $ 9.2 $ 17.4 $ 13.8
Research and Development Tax Credits, Net of Addback (0.8) (0.5) (0.6)
State Income Tax, Net of Federal Income Tax Benefit 0.5 1.9 1.9
Other 1.8 1.8 1.0
——- ——- ——-
Actual Tax Provision $ 10.7 $ 20.6 $ 16.1
======= ======= =======

Deferred tax liabilities (assets) were comprised of the following
for the years ended December 31:
Liabilities:
Unbilled Receivables $ 26.9 $ 20.4 $ 15.0
Capitalized Software 12.6 10.0 9.8
Other 0.9 6.6 3.7
——- ——- ——-
Total Gross Deferred Tax Liabilities 40.4 37.0 28.5

Assets:
Deferred Maintenance Revenue (1.6) (2.4) (3.3)
Restricted Stock (3.2) (3.0) (1.9)
Accrued Leave Costs (2.9) (2.2) (1.8)
Bad Debt Expense (13.9) (2.2) (1.6)
Other Deferred Revenue (0.8) (0.5) (0.1)
Other (3.1) (2.0) (1.1)
——- ——- ——-
Total Gross Deferred Tax Assets (25.5) (12.3) (9.8)
——- ——- ——-
Net Deferred Tax Liabilities $ 14.9 $ 24.7 $ 18.7
======= ======= =======

The Company paid income taxes of approximately $14.3 million, $16.4
million, and $9.1 million, in 1996, 1995, and 1994, respectively.

15

51

NOTE 7 — EMPLOYEE PENSION PLAN

The Company has established a simplified employee pension plan, which
became effective January 1, 1980. Contributions are based on the application of
a percentage specified by the Company to the qualified gross wages of eligible
employees. The Company makes annual contributions to the plan equal to the
amount accrued for pension expense. Total expense of the plan was $8.3 million
in 1996, $6.3 million in 1995, and $5.2 million in 1994.

NOTE 8 — COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

The Company occupies production facilities and office space (real
property) and uses various pieces of equipment under operating lease
agreements, expiring at various dates through the year 2011.

The commitments under these agreements, as of December 31, 1996, are
summarized in the table below. Payments under the real property leases are
generally subject to escalation based upon increases in the Consumer Price
Index, operating expenses, and property taxes. Sublease income represents
payments due to the Company from third parties under formal sublease agreements
covering real property.

Operating lease expense for 1996, 1995, and 1994 was approximately $34.1
million, $27.9 million, and $21.4 million, respectively.

The Company has an extended leave program for titled employees that
provides for compensated leave of eight weeks after seven years of service. The
leave is not vested and can be taken only at the discretion of management.
Because of the extended period over which the leave accumulates and the highly
discretionary nature of the program, the amount of extended leave accumulated
at any period end, which will ultimately be taken, is indeterminable.
Consequently, the Company expenses such leave as it is taken.

AMS performs, at any point in time, under a variety of contracts for many
different customers. Situations can occasionally arise where factors may result
in the renegotiation of existing contracts. Additionally, certain contracts may
provide the customer the right to suspend or terminate the contracts. To the
extent any contracts may provide the customer with such rights, the contracts
generally provide for AMS to be compensated for work performed to date and may
include provisions for payment of certain termination costs. However, business
and other considerations may at times influence the ultimate outcome of
contract renegotiation, suspension and/or cancellation. Management is not aware
of any major contract where there is presently a risk of suspension,
termination or significant renegotiation which would materially impact the
Company’s financial position or results of operations other than those already
provided for in the financial statements of the Company.

The Company’s fourth quarter and full year financial results for 1996 were
heavily influenced by one major event. The financial effect of a problem
associated with one large systems program in which the Company was engaged with
a non-US telecommunications industry client decreased the Company’s net income
by $23 million, or $0.55 per share. In December 1996, the Company had a delay
in completing one software release in this large multi-release program and the
Company began the process of renegotiating the entire program with the client.
Early in 1997, the client suspended a major part of the program. The Company
made a financial provision in its 1996 financial statements for the expected
impact of this situation in the form of reserves against receivables and the
accrual for contract losses on completion of the remaining work. The Company
does not believe, based on information available at this time, that the outcome
of the matters discussed above will have a further material adverse effect on
its financial position or results of operations.

16

52

Gross Rentals and Maintenance Payments



Net Rentals
and
Sublease Maintenance
(In millions) Real Property Equipment Total Income Payments

– ——————————————————————————————————————–


1997 $ 30.3 $3.3 $ 33.6 $0.2 $ 33.4
1998 31.2 2.6 33.8 0.1 33.7
1999 29.6 1.7 31.3 – 31.3
2000 27.5 0.6 28.1 – 28.1
2001 26.1 0.2 26.3 – 26.3
2002 through 2012 155.6 – 155.6 – 155.6
——- —- —— —- ——

Total $ 300.3 $8.4 $308.7 $0.3 $308.4
======= ==== ====== ==== ======

NOTE 9 — RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

The Company incurred legal fees and reimbursable expenses payable to Shaw,
Pittman, Potts & Trowbridge, general counsel to the Company, totaling
approximately $2.7 million, $2.5 million, and $2.0 million, in 1996, 1995, and
1994, respectively. A member of the firm of Shaw, Pittman, Potts & Trowbridge
is the spouse of one of the Company’s executive officers.

17

53

NOTE 10 — BUSINESS SEGMENT AND GEOGRAPHIC AREA INFORMATION

AMS operates in one industry segment — providing computer and information
technology products and services to large clients in targeted vertical markets.
However, AMS markets its services and products worldwide and its operations can
be grouped into two main geographic areas according to the location of each AMS
company. The two groupings consist of United States locations and non-US
locations (primarily in Australia, Belgium, Canada, England, Germany, Mexico,
Portugal, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, and The Netherlands). Pertinent financial
data, by geographic area, is summarized below.



Year Ended December 31 (In millions) 1996 1995 1994
– ——————————————————————————————————————–


Services and Products Revenues
U.S. Companies $571.2 $490.1 $356.3
Non-US Companies 161.4 71.4 52.5
—— —— ——

Consolidated Total 732.6 561.5 408.8
====== ====== ======

Income (Loss) From Operations
U.S. Companies 8.0 44.4 37.6
Non-US Companies 19.6 6.3 2.7
—— —— ——

Consolidated Total 27.6 50.7 40.3
====== ====== ======

Identifiable Assets
U.S. Companies 355.0 290.0 231.5
Non-US Companies 69.2 47.5 20.7
—— —— ——

Consolidated Total $424.2 $337.5 $252.2
====== ====== ======

Revenues from AMS’s U.S. Companies include export sales to non-US clients
of $106.4 million in 1996, $98.6 million in 1995, and $39.6 million in 1994. As
a result, the Company’s total non-US services and products revenues were as
follows:



Year Ended December 31 (In millions) 1996 1995 1994
– ——————————————————————————————————————-

Exports By U.S. Companies $106.4 $ 98.6 $39.6
Non-US Companies 161.4 71.4 52.5
—— —— —–

Total Non-US Services and Products Revenues $267.8 $170.0 $92.1
====== ====== =====

Percent of Total Services and Products Revenues 36.6% 30.3% 22.5%
====== ====== =====

18

54

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

To the Board of Directors and Stockholders of
American Management Systems, Incorporated

In our opinion, the accompanying consolidated financial statements
appearing on pages 3 to 18 of the 1996 Financial Statements present fairly, in
all material respects, the financial position of American Management Systems,
Incorporated and its subsidiaries at December 31, 1996 and 1995, and the
results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the three years in
the period ended December 31, 1996, in conformity with generally accepted
accounting principles. These financial statements are the responsibility of the
Company’s management; our responsibility is to express an opinion on these
financial statements based on our audits. We conducted our audits of these
statements in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards which
require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about
whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit
includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and
disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles
used and significant estimates made by management, and evaluating the overall
financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a
reasonable basis for the opinion expressed above.

PRICE WATERHOUSE LLP

Washington, D.C.
March 5, 1997

19

55

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF
OPERATIONS

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

The following table sets forth for the periods indicated the percentage of
total revenues of major items in the Consolidated Statements of Operations and
the percentage change in such items from period to period (see “Financial
Statements and Notes”). The effect of inflation and price changes on the
Company’s revenues, income from operations, and expenses, is comparable to the
general rate of inflation in the U.S. economy.



Period-to-Period
Percentage of Total Revenues Change
—————————- —————-
1996 1995
vs. vs.
1996 1995 1994 1995 1994
– —————————————————————————————————————-

Revenues
Services and Products 90.2% 88.8% 88.9% 30.5% 37.4%
Reimbursed Expenses 9.8 11.2 11.1 12.3 38.7
——- —— ——
100.0 100.0 100.0 28.4 37.5

Expenses
Client Project Expenses 64.8 55.1 53.6 50.9 41.2
Other Operating Expenses 25.9 30.4 30.5 9.4 37.3
Corporate Expenses 5.9 6.5 7.1 18.4 25.2
——- ——- ——-
96.6 92.0 91.2 34.5 38.6

Income from Operations 3.4 8.0 8.8 (45.6) 25.8

Other (Income) Expense 0.2 0.1 0.2 55.6 12.5
——- ——- ——-
Income Before Income Taxes 3.2 7.9 8.6 (47.4) 26.1

Income Taxes 1.3 3.3 3.5 (48.1) 28.0
——- ——- ——-

Net Income 1.9 4.6 5.1 (46.9) 24.8

Dividends and Accretion on Series B
Preferred Stock – – 0.1 – –
——- ——- ——-
Net Income to Common Shareholders 1.9 4.6 5.0 (46.9) 26.4

Weighted Average Shares and Equivalents 2.9 5.2

Net Income per Common Share (48.6) 20.0

20

56

This Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and
Results of Operations (“MD&A”) contains certain forward-looking statements. In
addition, the Company or its representatives from time to time may make, or may
have made, certain forward-looking statements, orally or in writing, including,
without limitation, any such statements made in the MD&A or any such statements
made, or to be made, in the MD&A contained in other filings with the Securities
and Exchange Commission. The Company wishes to ensure that such forward-looking
statements are accompanied by meaningful cautionary statements so as to ensure
to the fullest extent possible the protections of the safe harbor established
by the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Accordingly, such
forward-looking statements made by, or on behalf of, the Company are qualified
in their entirety by reference to, and are accompanied by, the discussion
herein of important factors that could cause the Company’s actual results to
differ materially from those projected in such forward-looking documents.

The Company’s fourth quarter and full year financial results for 1996 were
heavily influenced by one major event. The financial effect of a problem
associated with one large systems program in which the Company was engaged with
a non-US telecommunications industry client decreased the Company’s net income
by $23 million, or $0.55 per share. In December 1996, the Company had a delay
in completing one software release in this large multi-release program and the
Company began the process of renegotiating the entire program with the client.
Early in 1997, the client suspended a major part of the program. The Company
made a financial provision in its 1996 financial statements for the expected
impact of this situation in the form of reserves against receivables and the
accrual for contract losses on completion of the remaining work. The Company
does not believe, based on information available at this time, that the outcome
of the matters discussed above will have a further material adverse effect on
its financial position or results of operations. The underlying cause of this
problem was that the Company abbreviated certain of its normal processes,
including certain testing, in an attempt to meet a very ambitious delivery
schedule requested by the client to meet pressing business needs. As a result
of this situation, AMS has undertaken certain specific enhancements to its
management process for the very largest projects.

REVENUES

Services and products revenues (“S&P revenues”) increased 30% and 37%
during 1996 and 1995 compared to the preceding year. Over 85% of each year’s
S&P revenues came from clients for whom the Company performed services in prior
years. Looking ahead to 1997, the Company expects continued growth, however at
lower rates of increase than were experienced in 1996 and 1995.

Business with non-US clients increased 58% and 85% (to $268 million and
$170 million) during 1996 and 1995, respectively, and accounted for
approximately 57% and 51% of the total S&P revenue increase of the Company for
these two years. Business with European clients has dominated the rise in
non-US business, increasing 65% (to $231 million) and 83% (to $139 million) in
each of the past two years, with revenues from Telecommunications Firms being
the principal driver. For the year 1997, the Company expects non-US business,
and European business in particular, to show little growth over 1996, owing
principally to lower revenues with the non-US telecommunications client
discussed above.

In the Telecommunications Firms market, S&P revenues increased 42%
compared to 1995. Almost all of this increase is attributable to business with
non-US clients, which increased 66% during 1996 (to $214 million). Business in
this market is characterized by very large projects, with relatively few
clients. Approximately 85% of the 1996 S&P revenues in this market came from
work with 12 clients. Comparing 1995 to 1994, S&P revenues had increased 70%
overall, with a 109% increase in non-US business. For 1997, the Company expects
the annual growth in this market will be below that for 1996 and in line with
the Company’s overall growth rate, reflecting the impact of reduced revenues
from the non-US project. Most of the revenue increases in this market are
expected to be from domestic sources.

21

57

In the Financial Services Institutions target market, 1996 S&P revenues
increased 26% over 1995, owing principally to build-ups in business with
clients who started large projects in the second half of 1995. Business with
non-US clients account for approximately 30% of the revenues in this market
($49 million). Comparing 1995 to 1994, business in this market had increased
44%, owing to new business in 1995. For 1997, the Company expects S&P revenue
growth in this market to increase at rates slightly below the Company’s overall
revenue growth.

In the State and Local Governments and Education target market, S&P
revenues increased 36% in 1996 and 17% in 1995. The 1996 increase was fueled by
several large contracts with state taxation departments looking to make
substantial improvements in their ability to collect delinquent taxes and
continued subcontract work in the child support enforcement business. On some
of the contracts with state taxation departments, the Company’s fees are paid
out of the benefits (increased collections) that the client achieves. For such
contracts where the timing of the benefits are uncertain, the Company defers
revenues (and profits) until a future date. At the end of 1996, all such
contracts had provided enough benefits to fund the work. The Company expects
S&P revenues in the State and Local Governments and Education market to
increase in 1997 at rates slightly ahead of the increase in the Company’s
overall S&P revenues.

S&P revenues in the Federal Government Agencies target market increased
16% in 1996 and 9% in 1995. The Company expects S&P revenues in this target
market, for 1997, to increase at rates comparable to the overall growth rate of
the Company. The Company is in the final stages of competition with one other
firm for award of a significant contract with the Department of Defense. These
estimates do not include the potential award of such contract, which could
increase revenues from this market by a material percentage for 1997. There can
be no assurance that the Company will be awarded this contract.

S&P revenues from Other Corporate Clients increased 3% in 1996 and 20%
during 1995. S&P revenues from this market, which represents business in
smaller vertical markets, such as the health care market and the electric and
gas utilities market, for 1997, is expected to increase at rates exceeding the
Company’s overall growth in S&P revenues.

Beginning with the first quarter 1997, this section of MD&A will focus on
changes in total revenues for each target market, rather than services and
products revenues, consistent with the Company’s internal focus on total
revenues.

EXPENSES

Client project expenses and other operating expenses together increased
36% during 1996. Included in this increase are the provisions the Company
recorded for receivables and expected 1997 losses because of the previously
discussed contract with a non-US telecommunications company. These expenses
were reduced by significant reductions in performance-based incentive
compensation accruals for the senior managers in the business unit. Without
these additional expenses, client project and other operating expenses would
have increased by 31%, generally in line with the overall growth of the
Company. While some expenses, such as recruiting, staff development, and
general management, increased at rates equal to the overall Company’s growth
rate, other expenses, such as product support, research and development, and
business development, increased at rates below the overall growth rate.
Comparing 1995 to 1994, client project and other operating expenses increased
39%, which was approximately the same growth rate as in S&P revenues. Looking
to 1997, the Company anticipates that these expenses will be more in line with
the revenue growth. The Company expects to make significant expenditures
related to research and development as it produces the next generation of
software used in its telecommunications business. A majority of these
expenditures will be capitalized.

22

58

Corporate Expenses increased 18% and 25% in 1996 and 1995. The 1996 rate
of increase was lower than expected owing to reductions in performance-based
incentive compensation accruals for the corporate officers and lower
profit-based compensation accruals under the Company’s restricted stock
program, both owing to the year end developments in the non-US
telecommunications client project discussed earlier. Without these reductions,
corporate expenses would have increased 24%. For 1995, the slower growth rate
was principally due to corporate sponsored technology and training programs,
and performance-based compensation accruals not increasing as fast as revenues.

INCOME FROM OPERATIONS

Income from operations decreased 46% in 1996, compared to 1995,
principally due to the charges associated with the non-US client project.
Absent these charges, income from operations would have increased 31%,
comparable to the growth in revenues and in line with the Company’s
expectations. Comparing 1995 to 1994, income from operations increased 26%.
This rate of increase was less than the S&P revenue increase because 1) the
Company invested heavily in building up its staff capacity and 2) margins at
the project level were reduced because of the stress of absorbing so many new
people. For 1997, if the Company is successful in controlling the overall
growth rate, the Company would expect profit margins to improve. However, due
to the significant amount of management and staff resources that have been
consumed in attempting to resolve the issues with the non-US client project,
the reduced levels of revenues that these resources would have generated, and
incurring a majority of the Company’s recruiting costs early in the year,
profit margins in the first half of 1997 will be significantly below the
Company’s desired profit margin.

OTHER (INCOME) EXPENSE

Interest expense increased 39% in 1996, and 69% in 1995, because of
additional long-term debt incurred by the Company during 1995 and significant
increases in short-term borrowing to finance the growth of the Company. Other
income increased 29% in 1996, compared to 1995, due primarily to a refund of
property taxes.

INCOME TAXES

The Company’s effective tax rate for 1996 was 41.0% compared to 41.4% in
1995. The 1994 effective tax rate was 40.8%.

FOREIGN CURRENCY EXCHANGE

Approximately 36% of the Company’s total S&P revenues in 1996, 30% in
1995, and 23% in 1994, were derived from non-US business. The Company’s
practice is to negotiate contracts in the same currency in which the
predominant expenses are incurred, thereby mitigating the exposure to foreign
currency exchange fluctuations. It is not possible to accomplish this in all
cases, and the Company does take some risk that profits will be affected by
foreign currency exchange fluctuations. However, these risks are mitigated to
the extent the Company: 1) successfully negotiates short-term contracts (one
year or less), or 2) negotiates provisions that allow pricing adjustments
related to currency fluctuations. To date, the Company has not engaged in any
hedging activities relating to foreign currency exchange fluctuations.

23

59

LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES

The Company provides for its operating cash requirements primarily through
funds generated from operations, and secondarily from bank borrowings, which
provide for cash and currency management with respect to the short term impact
of certain cyclical uses such as annual payments of incentive compensation as
well as financing to some degree accounts receivable. At December 31, 1996, the
Company’s cash and cash equivalents totaled $62.8 million, up from $35.8
million at the end of 1995. Cash provided from operating activities, for 1996,
was $40.3 million. Although accounts receivable increased by 20%, cash provided
from operating activities increased due to improvements in the rate of
collection of the Company’s accounts receivable. The improvements occurred
despite continued delays in collecting accounts receivable related to
subcontract work with a prime contractor in the child support enforcement
business, and a receivable from a foreign government experiencing continued
cash flow problems. See Note 3 to the consolidated financial statements for
further discussion on accounts receivable.

The Company invested over $45.7 million in fixed assets and software
purchases, and computer software development during 1996. Revolving line of
credit borrowings increased by $30.4 million over 1996, which borrowings
consisted entirely of foreign currency borrowings by the Company’s non-US
subsidiaries, all of which borrowings remained outstanding at December 31,
1996. The aggregate weighted average short-term borrowings during 1996 was
approximately $29.1 million, at an weighted average interest rate of 5.3%.
During 1996, the Company made approximately $6.7 million in installment
payments of principal on outstanding debt owed to banks; the Company also
received approximately $9.5 million during the period from the exercise of
stock options and the tax benefits related thereto.

At December 31, 1996, the Company’s debt-equity ratio, as measured by
total liabilities divided by stockholders’ equity was 1.09, up from 0.92 at
December 31, 1995.

In December 1996, the Company entered into a new $100 million syndicated
multi-currency revolving credit ($80 million) and term debt ($20 million)
facility. In January 1997, the Company drew down the term debt. The $20 million
borrowed in January is not included in any of the Company’s 1996 financial
statement amounts.

The Company’s material unused source of liquidity at the end of 1996
consisted of approximately $53.3 million under the new revolving credit and
term debt facility. The Company believes that its liquidity needs can be met
from the various sources described above.

24

60

ASSUMPTIONS UNDERLYING CERTAIN FORWARD-LOOKING
STATEMENTS AND
FACTORS THAT MAY AFFECT FUTURE RESULTS

In the next few years, the Company expects growth in revenues to be at the
Company’s historical long-term rates and not at the exceptional rates posted in
recent years. The more controlled and lower growth in revenues should enable
the Company to improve its profit margins. These margins were reduced during
the last two years owing to heavy investment in building up staff capacity and
infrastructure, and the stress of absorbing many new professional staff. Delays
in the completion of one software release in a major multi-release project
during the fourth quarter of 1996, and the client’s subsequent suspension, in
early 1997, of another software release, also contributed to the Company’s
reduced profit margin for 1996.

The Company faces continuing risks in the area of project delivery and
staffing. AMS has established a reputation in the marketplace of being a firm
which delivers on time and in accordance with specifications regardless of the
complexity of the application and the technology. The Company’s customers often
have a great deal at stake in being able to meet market and regulatory demands,
and demand very ambitious delivery schedules. In order to meet it’s contractual
commitments, AMS must continue to be able to successfully recruit, train, and
assimilate large numbers of entry-level and experienced employees annually, as
well as to provide sufficient senior managerial experience on engagements,
especially on large, complex projects. Moreover, this staff must be re-deployed
on projects throughout North America, Europe, and other locations.

There is also the risk of successfully managing large projects and the
risk of a material impact on results because of the unanticipated delay,
suspension, renegotiation or cancellation of a large project. Any such
development in a project could result in a drop in revenues or profits, the
need to relocate staff, a potential dispute with a client regarding money owed,
and a diminution of AMS’s reputation. These risks are magnified in the largest
projects and markets simply because of their size. The Company’s business is
characterized by large contracts producing high percentages of the Company’s
revenues. For example, 34% of the Company’s total revenues in 1996 were derived
from business with ten clients. Events such as unanticipated declines in
revenues or profits could in turn result in immediate fluctuations in the
trading price and volume of the Company’s stock.

Certain other risks, including, but not limited to, the Company’s
increasing international scope of operations, are discussed elsewhere in this
Form 10-K. Because the Company operates in a rapidly changing and highly
competitive market, additional risks not discussed in this Form 10-K may emerge
from time to time. The Company cannot predict such risks or assess the impact,
if any, such risks may have on its business. Consequently, the Company’s
various forward-looking statements, made, or to be made, should not be relied
upon as a prediction of actual results.

25

61

FIVE-YEAR FINANCIAL SUMMARY



Year Ended December 31
(In millions except share and per share data) 1996 1995 1994 1993 1992
– ————————————————————————————————————————–
OPERATING RESULTS
– ————————————————————————————————————————–

Services and Products Revenues $732.6 $561.5 $408.8 $321.7 $295.5
Total Revenues 812.2 632.4 459.9 364.0 332.5

Client Project Expenses 525.9 348.6 246.9 189.3 175.2
Other Operating Expenses 210.4 192.3 140.1 115.6 104.7
Corporate Expenses 48.3 40.8 32.6 28.4 23.2
—— —— —— —— ——
Total Operating Expense 784.6 581.7 419.6 333.3 303.1
—— —— —— —— ——
Income From Operations 27.6 50.7 40.3 30.7 29.4

Other (Income) Expense 1.4 0.9 0.8 – –
—— —— —— —— ——
Income Before Income Taxes 26.2 49.8 39.5 30.7 29.4

Income Taxes 10.7 20.6 16.1 12.9 11.9

Income Before Cumulative Effect of
Change in Accounting Method 15.5 29.2 23.4 17.8 17.5

Cumulative Effect of Change in
Accounting for Income Taxes(1) – – – – 1.6
—— —— ——- —— ——
Net Income 15.5 29.2 23.4 17.8 19.1

Dividends and Accretion on Series B
Preferred Stock – – 0.3 0.8 1.5
—— —— —— —— ——
Net Income per Common Shareholders $ 15.5 $ 29.2 $ 23.1 $ 17.0 $ 17.6
====== ====== ====== ====== ======

PER COMMON SHARE DATA
– ————————————————————————————————————————–

Income per Common Share Before Cumulative
Effect of Change in Accounting Method $ 0.37 $ 0.72 $ 0.60 $ 0.46 $ 0.45

Cumulative Effect per Common Share of
Change in Accounting for Income Taxes1 – – – – 0.05
—— —— —— —— ——
Net Income per Common Share $ 0.37 $ 0.72 $ 0.60 $ 0.46 $ 0.50

Weighted Average Shares and Equivalents 41,925,353 40,707,633 38,731,422 36,663,440 35,466,059

Common Shares Outstanding at Year End 40,939,209 40,040,454 39,294,780 36,258,602 35,265,923

FINANCIAL POSITION
– ————————————————————————————————————————–

Total Assets 424.2 $337.5 $252.2 $185.0 $165.9
Fixed Assets, Net 48.0 37.1 28.7 21.3 16.8
Working Capital 125.0 115.6 89.4 67.3 72.2
Noncurrent Liabilities 22.3 26.8 21.3 19.6 12.0
Stockholders’ Equity 203.1 175.5 138.3 99.0 85.8

– ————————
(1) In 1992, the Company adopted FAS 109 — Accounting for Income Taxes.

26

62

FIVE-YEAR REVENUES BY TARGET MARKET



Year Ended December 31 (In millions)(1) 1996 1995 1994 1993 1992
– ————————————————————————————————————————–

Services and Products

Telecommunication Firms $290.9 $205.2 $120.6 $ 77.8 $ 61.2
Financial Services Institutions 165.6 131.3 91.5 59.9 57.1
State and Local Governments and Education 130.6 95.9 81.6 66.0 59.9
Federal Government Agencies 111.1 95.8 87.5 91.6 89.8
Other Corporate Clients 34.4 33.3 27.6 26.4 27.5
—— —— —— —— ——

Total Services and Products Revenues 732.6 561.5 408.8 321.7 295.5

Reimbursed Expenses Revenues 79.6 70.9 51.1 42.3 37.0
—— —— —— —— ——

Total Revenues $812.2 $632.4 $459.9 $364.0 $332.5
====== ====== ====== ====== ======

– ————————

(1) Effective in 1993, the Company eliminated Energy Industry Clients as a
separately reported market with the revenues reclassified under Federal
Government Agencies and Other Corporate Clients.

27

63

SELECTED QUARTERLY FINANCIAL DATA AND INFORMATION ON AMS STOCK (UNAUDITED)

The following summary represents the results of operations for the two
years in the period ended December 31, 1996. The common stock of American
Management Systems, Inc., is traded in the NASDAQ over-the-counter market under
the symbol AMSY. References to the stock prices are the high and low bid prices
during the calendar quarters.

(In millions except per share data)



Net Income to Net Income Stock Bid Price
Income Before Common per Common —————
Revenues Income Taxes Shareholder Share High Low
– ————————————————————————————————————————-

1996:
– ————————————————————————————————————————-

March 31 $181.4 $ 11.3 $ 6.6 $ 0.16 $26.625 $18.250
June 30 188.8 14.3 8.3 0.20 33.375 24.375
September 30 217.5 18.5 10.7 0.25 31.125 21.625
December 31 224.4 (18.0) (10.1) (0.24) 37.125 20.375

1995:
– ————————————————————————————————————————-

March 31 $135.7 $ 8.3 $ 4.9 $ 0.12 $14.000 $11.417
June 30 157.5 11.5 6.6 0.16 16.917 12.667
September 30 162.7 12.9 7.5 0.19 18.333 15.500
December 31 176.5 17.1 10.2 0.25 20.500 15.583

The Company has never paid any cash dividends on its common stock and does
not anticipate paying dividends in the foreseeable future. Its policy is to
invest retained earnings in the operation and expansion of its business. Future
dividend policy with respect to its common stock will be determined by the
Board of Directors based upon the Company’s earnings, financial condition,
capital requirements, and other then-existing conditions.

The approximate number of shareholders of record of the Company’s common
stock as of March 24, 1997 was 888.

28

64

OTHER INFORMATION

TRANSFER AGENT AND REGISTRAR

Chemical Mellon Shareholder Services, L.L.C.
Ridgefield Park, N.J.

INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

Price Waterhouse LLP
Washington, D.C.

COUNSEL

Shaw, Pittman, Potts & Trowbridge
Washington, D.C.

STOCKHOLDER AND 10-K INFORMATION

Financial inquiries should be directed to Frank A. Nicolai, Secretary of the
Company, American Management Systems, Incorporated, 4050 Legato Road, Fairfax,
Virginia 22033. Telephone (703) 267-8000. A complimentary copy of the Company’s
Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
will be provided upon written request.

ANNUAL MEETING

The annual shareholders meeting has been scheduled for May 9, 1997 in Fairfax,
Virginia, for stockholders of record on March 21, 1997.

29

65
AMERICAN MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS, INCORPORATED

PROXY FOR ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS — MAY 9, 1997
THIS PROXY IS SOLICITED BY THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS.

The undersigned hereby appoints Charles O. Rossotti, Patrick W. Gross,
and Frank A. Nicolai, and each of them, as proxies, with full power of
substitution in each, to vote all shares of the common stock of American
Management Systems, Incorporated (the “Company”), which the undersigned is
entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting of Shareholders of the Company to be
held on May 9, 1997 at 10:00 A.M. local time, and at any adjournment thereof,
on all matters set forth in the Notice of Annual Meeting and Proxy Statement,
dated April 11, 1997, a copy of which has been received by the undersigned, as
follows on the reverse side.

THIS PROXY WILL BE VOTED AS DIRECTED OR, IF NO DIRECTION IS GIVEN,
WILL BE VOTED “FOR” EACH OF THE MATTERS STATED.



1. ELECTION OF DIRECTORS: [ ] GRANT AUTHORITY to vote for all nominees listed to the right
(except as marked to the contrary).

[ ] WITHHOLD AUTHORITY to vote for all nominees listed to the
right.

Charles O. Rossotti, Patrick W. Gross, Paul A. Brands, Philip M.
Giuntini, Frank A. Nicolai, Daniel J. Altobello, James J.
Forese, Dorothy Leonard, W. Walker Lewis, Frederic V. Malek,
Alan G. Spoon.

INSTRUCTION: To withhold authority to vote for any individual
nominee, write that nominee’s name in the space provided below.

2. APPROVAL OF 1996 AMENDED STOCK OPTION PLAN F:

[ ] FOR [ ] AGAINST [ ] ABSTAIN

3. GRANT AUTHORITY upon such other matters as may come before the meeting,
including the adjournment of the meeting, as they determine to be in the
best interests of the Company:

[ ] FOR [ ] AGAINST [ ] ABSTAIN

Dated: , 1997
———————-

————————————

————————————
Signature of Shareholder(s)

IMPORTANT: Please mark this Proxy, date, sign exactly as your name(s)
appear(s), and return in the enclosed envelope. If shares are
held jointly, signature need only include one name. Trustees
and others signing in a representative capacity should so
indicate.



—–END PRIVACY-ENHANCED MESSAGE—–